this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2024
22 points (100.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

39762 readers
1449 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)

Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.

Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.

Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.

Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.

Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.

Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.

Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.

Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.

Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.

Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
jeffw@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
22
Why does Microsoft want me to upgrade from Windows 10 to Windows 11? (self.nostupidquestions)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by ChillDude69 to c/nostupidquestions@lemmy.world
65 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Particularly, why are they so desperately pushy about it? WHAT COULD POSSIBLY BE IN IT FOR THEM???

I would understand if I was having to pay for the upgrade. Then, ya know, they would be MOTIVATED by the fucking PROFIT MOTIVE.

But it's an apparently entirely free upgrade. So please, could someone fill in these blanks for me: "Microsoft wants me to upgrade to Windows 11 (and then 12) because _______. They will directly (or even indirectly) benefit in the following ways: ______________________"

Now, I'm not a complete fucking moron. I realize that they want to close out support for Windows 10. But that doesn't explain the out-and-out salesmanship that's going on, every time the fuckers try to get me to upgrade.

A couple other things, before you even start yapping at me:

First off, I will only upgrade to Windows 11 or 12 when I am absolutely forced to do so, on the day that Windows 10 becomes unsupported, and will therefore become a security risk.

NOTHING will convince me to "upgrade" my operating system before that date. Nothing. I don't care what you have to say. You WILL fail to persuade me. Don't even make the attempt.

In my opinion, Windows 7 should have been the last version of the OS. It should just have been patched forever, until some kind of major revolution in the whole basis of computing finally made its entire architecture fundamentally obsolete.

Updating an operating system is beyond drudgery, and each "upgrade" adds completely counter-productive, worse-than-useless bloat and nonsense. There is nothing to be excited about, when a new version of any operating system comes out. They should literally stop coming out.

Second, I'm not switching to Linux. I have used Linux in the past, for specific tasks and specific situations, but it will NEVER be my primary operating system, on my primary PC.

Do not bother trying to convince me to switch. Again: you WILL fail to persuade me. Do not waste your time. Linux is always 80-90 percent of the way toward being a true turn-key, user-friendly solution, especially for someone who has a long history of using Windows software, for both work and gaming. And 90 percent good simply isn't good enough.

The learning curve isn't worth it. No, I don't want to hear anything you have to say about that. I'm not interested in how good the current version of whatever Linux branch has gotten. Do not bother. I promise you, I will not be reading it.

EDIT: if you even mention Apple, I will just laugh in your face.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] infinitevalence@discuss.online 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You are the product. If you don't like it then fix that last 10% in Linux or find alternatives to the few things holding you back.

[–] ChillDude69 7 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I asked for an explanation, but I got a lecture. Which I fucking knew that I would.

But at least it was a short lecture. Short enough that I bothered reading it, so I guess you got that much over on me. Congrats, I suppose.

I won't be switching to Linux, though. I am not interested in fixing that last 10%. That's always what the Linux (and open-source) crowd always wants: at least a little bit of completely free labor, from everyone.

[–] UnRelatedBurner@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

ngl you come off very toxic. You asked a question that you know 100% the answer to. You made sure with strong words to kill all meaningful solutions to your problem. And responded to this guy pointing out the flaw in your ideology very aggressively.

[–] ChillDude69 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I honestly didn't 100 percent know the answer. I was seriously wondering if there was some direct, specific reason that I hadn't thought of. But it's just the boring speculation that I could have done. I agree I shouldn't have bothered.

As for toxicity, sure. I'm toxic. The world is toxic. It's the new fashion. I believe we are all bearing witness to the Great Filter that keeps all civilizations from achieving high technology and exploring the universe (read up on the concept). The "filter" is simply ourselves. We fucking suck.

In essence, intelligence itself was nature's greatest mistake. Awareness is a curse. All is vanity. We're cresting the peak of our achievements, as naked apes, and we will shortly begin the painful process of erasing all our gains, and returning to dust. Good riddance, and I mean that. We are not a good thing for the planet, nor for ourselves.

But I don't have to be all sweetness and light about any of it.

[–] UnRelatedBurner@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

Instead of responding to whatever this AI esque auto generated thing is, I'm just going to say: rule 14.

[–] theamigan@lemmy.dynatron.me 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This sub merely asks for questions but instead we got a wall of indignant text about how you will pre-ignore any solutions to your complaint.

[–] ChillDude69 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

solutions to your complaint

Read my question again. I was not asking for "solutions." I was not asking for tech support. I was asking for the REASON behind Microsoft specifically wanting people to agree to a free upgrade of their OS.

Read through my replies. I have been entirely receptive and cordial toward any speculation on that topic.

What I didn't want was advice. Or lectures. Or solutions. On the one hand, I was so clear about that point that you referred to my post as a "wall of indignant text." On the other hand, I guess my wall of text wasn't big enough, because you still didn't understand the question.

Again: I was asking about the whys and the hows of the situation. Not solutions to it. And plenty of people have provided good answers.

[–] theamigan@lemmy.dynatron.me 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ask your doctor if Xanax is right for you.

[–] ChillDude69 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

As I mentioned to someone else, look at the world we're living in. Mood-altering drugs are for situations when nothing is wrong, but you're sad and numb anyway.

But, ya know, that's not the case. Look around. Everything is wrong. We all have good reasons to be sad, numb, furious, tired, etc. Therefore, it's inappropriate to drug ourselves into feeling slap-hap-fuckin'-happy.

That would be like getting into a motorcycle accident, noticing your leg is shattered, with bones sticking out of the skin, and saying "I guess I'll take morphine forever. As long as I'm feelin' fine, it's alllll good."

No. Not good. Pain and rage are the appropriate and logical responses to our situation. Medicating ourselves into not feeling those perfectly appropriate emotions would just be drug abuse. If I want to abuse drugs, I'll get them off the street, and pay a way more reasonable price than my health insurance would suck out of my wallet, for their approved happy-feel-good drugs.

[–] theamigan@lemmy.dynatron.me 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

As someone else said, you sound super toxic, and frankly, insufferable. I've had friends like you. They are exceedingly tiresome people to be around.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] rufus@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

But it's true. They (like everyone else) want to sell you their newest product. That is how capitalism works. That's how they make money. But here it's the other way around. You are the product. Still, you need to be upgraded to the newest version, so the newest data trickles in, the newest advertising is possible.

You seem a bit agitated. But it is how it is. Pick your poison. Be it Windows 10, 11, MacOS or Linux.

[–] ChillDude69 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

You seem a bit agitated

I have the misfortune to be living in 2024. If you are not agitated, you are not paying attention.

And I suppose I was looking for a more specific answer than really exists, for this situation. From Microsoft's perspective, they need me to upgrade, so that I can be part of the current version of their money-sucking system. Whatever. I'll do it. Who even cares.

[–] rufus@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

living in 2024 [...] you are not paying attention

On the contrary, I'm paying very good attention. And I'm well prepared. I watch all that mess from far away, and just boot my windows four times a year. That's annoying enough for me.

I was looking for a more specific answer than really exists

Yeah, you can't look for the answer that pleases you. At least not if objective reality exists. You either look for an answer that is true, or you don't need to bother looking if you know what you want to believe beforehand.

[–] theamigan@lemmy.dynatron.me 4 points 1 year ago

Your agitation is largely self-induced, as you stomp your feet and whine like a toddler denied his toy rather than mitigating it like an adult. Microsoft is a business. Their motivation is to deliver as little value to the user as possible while making as much money as possible. This has been this way since they won the IBM DOS contract and no longer had to compete on their product alone. You can whine, or you can use something else that better aligns with your needs and values as a user.

[–] technomad@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 year ago

Lots of people care.

It's surprising that you'd give up so easily considering you were motivated enough to make an insightful post about the whole matter.

[–] missingno@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

What answer would have satisfied you? You started off aggressive and combative in the OP, then acted surprised when you were met in kind.

[–] infinitevalence@discuss.online 4 points 1 year ago

That's fine but you asked why it's free and it's free to you because you are the product.

If you don't want to be the product it's up to you to change the situation. Linux, Unix, Mac, Android are all options even if they are not options that interest you.

[–] Boozilla@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I hate Microsoft.

However, it's expensive for them (or anyone) to maintain old software with never-ending security patches.

All software has a lifecycle. When they said Windows 10 would be the last version, we all knew they were full of shit. Never believe promises made by a corporate marketing team.

They also want to brag to shareholders about Windows 11 adoption numbers. So it's in their interest to coerce more people into upgrading.

[–] ChillDude69 3 points 1 year ago

That's fair enough. I suppose it's cost-effective enough to try and nag people to switching, as soon as possible, as I noted in another comment.

[–] elshandra@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

So they can put AI in everything and slurp all your data. Well at least, they don't say they aren't doing that.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It costs money to keep an OS patched and secure. They don't wanna do it anymore.

[–] ChillDude69 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It costs money to make a brand-new OS and keep it patched and secure. Why do they want to do that?

I suspect it's got something to do with selling everyone's data and/or advertising to them, and/or selling them products and services.

[–] exscape@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

They obviously want their newest/flagship OS to be secure, or people wouldn't want to use it, and they'd be stuck supporting people on 10+ year old OS:es instead.

[–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I mean yeah, that's a probably part of it. The latest Outlook and Teams app is a privacy nightmare. Plus there’s ads, but sadly that’s nothing new with Windows. It’s also a continuation of their push for SaaS, pushing their subscription services like One Drive and O365. They also really want you to use their App Store to buy software.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago

Dunno but I've finally gotten sick of windows.

Been spending my time after work the last 2 weeks shifting my software stack from windows to a debian testbench, while learning docker. Once that's finally mirrored the way I want I'll wipe the windows machine, install Debian, and move all the containers back over to it.

Microsoft can go fornicate themselves with a chainsaw.

[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don’t really know and am not going to take time to look for example articles, but it seems like I’ve seen a lot of stories lately where Microsoft has a lot of ability to track users internally in Windows 11 for better “spyware” for Microsoft’s own financial gain. Largely it seems to be to get people to use more of Microsoft’s paid services that have recurring fees, which will benefit Microsoft financially more in the long run than a one-time upgrade fee.

[–] ChillDude69 5 points 1 year ago

I guess that's the boringly probable answer. They need to eventually get everyone to switch, before 10 becomes unsupported anyway, so they might as well also try and get everyone onto the new spy-riffic, service-tastic version, as soon as possible.

Boring dystopia vibes.

[–] pan_troglodytes@programming.dev 8 points 1 year ago

less a question and more of an opinion. is there an opinion community? maybe post there instead

[–] ItsComplicated@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

My insane thoughts are this, Microsoft wants all your data so they may use it to sell you something, from the advertisers they made money from by sharing your information.

Microsoft is also in bed with OpenAI. It seems OpenAI wants an operating system that will require you, as a user, surrendering to them full access and control of everything. https://gizmodo.com/openai-wants-to-control-your-computer-1851240566

Profit and control are the ultimate goal, imo.

[–] PassingThrough@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I won't claim to know for sure, but I'll place my bet on it still being about motivated by profit and growth. Supposedly Windows 10 was supposed to be the last Windows ever, and move to an eternal patching process, but I guess that didn't stick. So obviously just keeping you on Windows isn't enough, they found a need to create a refresh.

I did notice that refresh has new hardware requirements, like TPM modules and such. Deals with the OEMs to get people to buy/build new PCs?

There's talk of advertisements and sponsored links in the very Start Menu, so partnerships with advertisers to get closer to your daily activities?

I won't say I know for sure, because I only use Windows for video games. So, I too will be running Windows 10 until the games don't work anymore. Might I recommend, if you can get a copy, Windows 10 LTSC? It is a bared bones version of Windows made (by Microsoft) for enterprises and governments who would never buy into consumer features like advertising and analytics, so it's very clean, fast, and not full of spying junk or ads like the Home versions. And it hasn't bugged me once about upgrading. All my games run fine after some one-time minor command prompt foolery to get the Store and XBOX game pass apps back.

EDIT: Also, LTSC is Long-Term Support Channel, so additionally it will be supported longer than the regular editions, and be safer longer. Unless they change their minds this time around of course, but I doubt it. You don't rush the government through a PC upgrade if you want them to fund you.

[–] ChillDude69 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

There’s talk of advertisements and sponsored links in the very Start Menu, so partnerships with advertisers to get closer to your daily activities?

That's probably a big part of it. I've become so jaded about that whole thing that I'm almost past objecting to it, on any philosophical level. I just wish new Windows versions wouldn't always add so much CPU and memory overhead.

I mean, shit, I've got an almost-four-year-old Android tablet that I use for watching YouTube (and pornography) from the comfort of my bed, and that thing manages to do whatever behind-the-scenes tracking of my activities it wants to do, without sucking up 28 percent of the whole system's resources, just to run the OS.

And that fucker wasn't any kind of top-of-the-line powerhouse, when I got it. And I expect to still be using it for at least another year, if not two.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

I think Windows 8 is the most hated version of Windows ever. Balmer jumped the gun on that one, trying to integrate UI design between Microsoft phones and desktop Windows, was never seen as a benefit by users. I guess many believe Windows 7 was the last really good version of Windows.
Personally I love these Windows upgrades, every single one of them. They are always good opportunities for Linux users to get good hardware dirt cheap.
As to why Microsoft wants you to upgrade IDK, maybe because it helps OEMs sell more machines, each with a paid Windows license?
Microsoft may also have upped the level of advertising and found more ways to monetize it.

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I think Windows 8 is the most hated version of Windows ever.

You must not have been around for Millenium Edition.

[–] registeredusername@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

WindowsME was really a bad and traumatic moment. He had a mental block ;)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Froyn@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I challenge your claim that Windows 8 is/was the most hated version of Windows.
Let me remind you of the trainwreck that was Windows ME.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] noisypine@infosec.pub 3 points 1 year ago

You sound like my buddies 10yo daughter when she hops online to play games with us. "Everything is not fair, I want it to magically change without my intervention and I don't want to do anything about it or be told to take action or take advice that is given."

[–] OfficerBribe@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because it's their newest OS? Why do you think there is some hidden malicious reason, all software companies want everyone to start using their newest offerings as soon as possible.

[–] ChillDude69 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why do you think there is some hidden malicious reason, all software companies want everyone to start using their newest offerings as soon as possible

If they were asking me to pay money for their product, nothing would be suspicious about their behavior. But I'll be getting it "for free." And yet they're acting as if they're selling it to me.

You don't think that warrants suspicion?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments