this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2024
187 points (100.0% liked)

World News

45371 readers
4369 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

PARIS, Feb 26 (Reuters) - France's President Emmanuel Macron said on Monday there was no consensus on sending troops to Ukraine, but the subject could not be ruled out.

"There is no consensus at this stage... to send troops on the ground," Macron said after hosting some 20 countries allied to Ukraine.

"Nothing should be excluded. We will do everything that we must so that Russia does not win."


Saved you a click. ~~Yes, that's it. That's the entire "article". A total of 4 sentences. What exactly was the point of writing such a short article?~~

Edit: pulled my head out of my ass.

[–] [email protected] 62 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What exactly was the point of writing such a short article?

  1. Reuters is first and foremost a wire service

  2. This statement is more important than most anything else Reuters will publish today.

In conclusion, pull your head out of your ass.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Noted. If this is what people expect (and/or want) from Reuters, then it's none of my business how much they put in a single article. Have a nice day.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

@malijaffri Really, though. Reuters is and has always been a tiny bite of news wire service - - meaning that what they do is limited to snippets of pertinent information that could be easily transmitted over a telegraph wire in old timey days.

They've stuck to that style since forever. The idea is to get the base of the story out quickly and succinctly, and honestly, how much more do you really require, here? It's a pretty straightforward quote, with no written plans in place, but... Newsworthy.

That's what Reuters does.

@Stamau123 @Telodzrum

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yo, but seriously. If you like having your head in your ass, you should do it. Empower yourself and don't let anyone yuck your yum.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

For real, we’re not here to kinkshame

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I swear these people just want war. How do you think Putin's going to react to that? France and Germany have been pushing too hard for my liking to beef up weapons manufacturing. It's as if someone told them war=profits and rebuilding afterwards=profits and a nice way to get rid of an entire generation of problems.

Maybe someone should thell them the current generation isn't ready to mindlessly throw their lives away for these aholes. Or you know do your effing job and be a diplomat?

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago

Russia can end this in a day by withdrawing their aggressive seizure of sovereign Ukrainian territory.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago

Giving away your money and weapons for free is not a very good way to make money imo

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

They want profits, if that involves war, so be it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Russian agent

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Because that won't escalate things at all...

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago

If all Russia has to do to get people to back off is cry "escalation!" Then might as well just surrender to them now.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago

I'd imagine any path to end Russia's attacks can be construed as escalation

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

Russia could deescalate quite easily...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Russian Agent

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No troops without negotiations has to be the stance. Putin and Zelenski at a table

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

There's nothing to discuss.
Putin invaded a sovereign country and the only acceptable outcome is returning all of Ukraine's lost territory including Crimea, Ukraine should have to sacrifice absolutely nothing.
That doesn't require a discussion, it requires Putin to pack up and leave.