this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2024
556 points (100.0% liked)

World News

46098 readers
2860 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 135 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I work on OpenFoodFacts, and the big issue is simply the amount of saturated fats and refined sugars there are in a lot of processed foods.

Like, sure, people have to be held personally responsible to some extent, but it should also be on the government to properly regulate how foods are advertised. I really appreciate the Nutriscore system that's being pushed for in Europe despite the flaws it has, and here in Canada they've been making some changes in how certain products are shown on shelves such as requiring labeling if they're high in sugar or fats and changing the previous confusing labels for energy drinks with a more easy-to-read Supplemental Food Facts label.

End of the day though, if something is still being labelled as being "healthy" when it really isn't, that's all it takes to fool the average consumer unfortunately. Stuff like Lucky Charms shouldn't be advertised to kids as "part of a complete breakfast", and it's absurd that a lot of "healthier" alternatives to certain foods are being advertised that way despite only being barely any better than the original product, like turkey bacon or veggie straws.

[–] [email protected] 58 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Like when Coke argued in court that no reasonable person would think Vitamin Water is actually good for you.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago

Yes, but I don't remember if that was before or after Fox News successfully argued that no reasonable person would mistake them for a News Outlet

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You can have something packed with sugars that says "NO FAT!" on the label, and otherwise intelligent people will think it's healthy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lobbyists have even polluted the ingredient label on the back. Now they can list a brand name as an ingredient, then list the ingredients of that. This lets them disguise the most prevalent ingredients if they're also part of the brand.

Water, oil, sugar, xantham gum, Bob's secret spice (enough sugar so that if the label were truthful, sugar would be the second ingredient instead of the third, cinnamon, nutmeg).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 89 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Just a few things come to mind :

  • Lobbyists stopping sugar taxes.
  • Big Pharma and health industry making tons of money.
  • European Union being very tolerant about pesticides.
  • Supermarkets putting candy close the counters where parents with kids are in queue.
  • Lots of people spending most of their time on mobile phones only exercising the muscles of their eyes.

I am happy that an organisation like Foodwatch exists : https://www.foodwatch.org/en/foodwatch-international

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

To be fair my eye and thumb muscles are jacked.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • US restaurant portions are humongous. I thought it was exaggerated until I passed through, God damn that's a lot of food.
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago

Capitalism has brought prosperity and wealth to rational actors across the entire globe!

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Yep we all eat too much. I started counting calories and found out that I was eating twice as much as I should have. It's not obvious and every place serves big portions.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

I've been counting calories for the last few months, and that was my big realization as well. I could have easily put down a single meal at a restaurant which is my entire (or more) daily intake now.

More than anything it's just awareness.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

I'm counting calories too, it's not even the amount but it's that some foods are total calorie bombs. You can pretty easily ingest a day's worth of calories in a single meal at the restaurant without really feeling like you overate, but if I pay attention and select my foods properly I can feel like I ate plenty and be under 1500cal a day.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

It's not just that we eat "too much" but also that we're eating too much non-nutritive foods. The United States has entirely too many so-called "food deserts" where people are unable to purchase healthy foods

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Food_desert

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

But we can't seem to feed all children 3 meals a day in the US.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›