Yeah, there are many FOSS organizations in the U.S. like the Open Source Lab by the Oregon State University, the Open Source Software Institute, and many others. I guess they could do it, possibly if some join forces.
0x815
I agree in principal with that view, but there was pressure from VW's top investors (Union Investment, Deka) to clarify the situation in Xinjiang. An audit turned out to be extremely flawed which put further pressure on the management. It's hard to tell how much this contributed to the decision, but at least some shareholders weren't indifferent about the situation.
The USA can certainly do this, they have all what it takes. Public investments for such stuff will be hard to get in the next four years I guess, but there could be some private initiative?I don't know the U.S. good enough in that respect, though.
Strange. Here is the Reuters news about it: https://www.reuters.com/world/eu-proposes-sanctions-against-chinese-firms-helping-russia-bloomberg-news-2024-11-25/
Yeah, and hats off to the judges.
This has long been done :-)
As I said multiple times, this is one reason among others why we need transparent supply chains. It is exactly China which opposes this. This is bad for world (and bad for China, too).
In addition to that from another source, the Climate Action Tracker for China:
Policies and action against fair share: Insufficient
NDC (nationally determined contributions ) target against modelled domestic pathways: Highly insufficient
NDC target against fair share: Insufficient
Net Zero Target = Year 2060: Comprehensiveness rated as Poor
Overall rating: Highly insufficient
Governments could enforce laws to reduce their emissions, but they don't.
The only way to measure it is where it is produced. This is what this and other reports are doing. Governments could reduce their emissions, especially in countries where they are high. It's not the case, though.
@Che
Who says that?