486

joined 2 years ago
[–] 486@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I like Miniflux.

[–] 486@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (5 children)

The at load efficency isn't always the most important metric, depending on what you are using the machines for. If they are mostly idle, efficiency isn't too bad. Many server tasks don't load the CPU to the fullest anyway.

[–] 486@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They are not too terrible really. 3rd gen i7 is the Ivy Bridge generation, so 22 nm. For many homelab server tasks the CPUs would be just fine. Power efficiency is of course worse than modern CPUs, but way better than the previous 32 nm Sandybridge generation. I had such a system with integrated graphics and one SSD and that drew 15 W at idle at the wall.

[–] 486@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Pi Zero uses the CPU from the 3

No, the original Pi Zero uses the CPU of the Pi1 (only clocked higher). So it is quite a bit slower than a Pi 2, since it has only a single ARMv6 CPU core. Still fine for a DNS server on a typical home network.

[–] 486@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

It won’t get wikis or issues though.

You can easily mirror Github wikis as well. You just need to add .wiki.git to the repo URL. That way you can clone the wiki just like any other Git repo.

[–] 486@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

This is pretty neat. If this was a real museum, you'd have to do a lot of walking, that's for sure!

[–] 486@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Perhaps a Raspberry Pi 500 (or the older Raspberry Pi 400), can do all the things an ordinary Raspberry Pi can, but comes as a complete device with built-in keyboard. Runs Linux and is rather easy to use.

1
Schon wieder (datajournal.org)
 

Der Aufstieg der NSDAP/AfD

[–] 486@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, Bonzi Buddy!

[–] 486@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

There is also AMD and they are doing pretty well. I wouldn't write off x86 just yet. But less competition is never a good thing, and Broadcom buying another company has never resulted in anything good, as far as I can tell. For anyone except Broadcom themselves.

[–] 486@lemmy.world 52 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It is, but Signal and Matrix aren't really all that similar. Matrix's privacy is pretty atrocious. It stores tons of meta data about users all over the place. That's the exact opposite of what Signal does.

[–] 486@lemmy.world 76 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Ugh, Broadcom buying Intel would be terrible.

[–] 486@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Sure, if you have exactly one client that can access the server and you can ensure physical security of the actual network, I suppose it is fine. Still, those are some severe limitations and show how limited the ancient NFS protocol is, even in version 4.

 

Bitwarden introduced a non-free dependency to their clients. The Bitwarden CTO tried to frame this as a bug but his explanation does not really make it any less concerning.

Perhaps it is time for alternative Bitwarden-compatible clients. An open source client that's not based on Electron would be nice. Or move to something else entirely? Are there any other client-server open source password managers?

view more: next ›