A32topsL

joined 7 months ago
MODERATOR OF
 

Have you noticed? The "realistic" or "realism" AI results for man/woman have apparent big heads (mostly even huge) compared to their own bodies. It's like the camera is close to the face. Even the results in Google Search have such phenomena. The obvious ones are for Asian women. Why as such for perhaps even the different AI's, why the same pattern from them?

Try searching for such now, try something like: "realistic AI Asian woman", and you'll even see ones with actual HUGE heads, most especially the "realistic" ones. Different AI programs and yet the same huge head pattern from them?

Any actual AI users, could you please share your experience too? Thanks in advance for any enlightenment.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

spoilerWell, since I joined I realized, seems like lots of Lemmy users in most Lemmy instances are quite unnecessarily sensitive to revealing get-up. It's like automatic for them. My previous posts from other Communities were downvoted (which simply messes the ranking) especially those I initially didn't NSFW'd, since I, myself thought they were not NSFW.

So with such small data, I compromised to just simply mark them as NSFW for both male and female. Hence such will be invisible to those who disabled NSFW. It's like the word "sexy" nowadays, years ago it was truthfully a fine compliment in comment sections (like in Flickr) when the big social media platforms were not prevalent yet.

 

Resizing then padding a centered video, maintaining aspect ratio, to a final 720 x 1280, with the same top an bottom colors, say darkgray, is below, which I think I got from Stack Overflow or somewhere (it works).

  • scale=720:1280:flags=spline:force_original_aspect_ratio=decrease:eval=frame,pad=720:1280:-1:-1:eval=frame:color=darkgray

But I would like to have different colors for top and bottom paddings. See the example pic below, which I want. Thanks in advance.

 

External images could be linked and displayed using:

  • ![](external url)

Then Lemmy images could be resized which I think also shrinks the file size; hence faster display time, save internet data, and save screen space; by adding &thumbnail=:

  • ![](https://lemmy. .../pictrs/image/... .webp?format=webp&thumbnail=320)

So, is it possible to do similar but for any external image? Or at least generate thumbnails of many external images? Thanks in advance.

10
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

I used to answer there maybe weekly or at least monthly, and I don't remember any spam activity at all. All posts I remember back there were asking for how to.

So no idea why the Reddit AI got triggered to ban the sub, but back then I noticed Subreddits were indeed banned quite often for whatever reason, with the Spam accusation as the default.

Now, one common issue was performance issue, like the player's response time and lagging. One simple solution to try is:

  1. View, or Right click
  2. Renderer Settings
  3. Reset
  4. Reset to default/optimal renderer settings
  • Shaders also increase CPU usage especially Pre-Resize.
  • Repeated editing of Matroska files, like repeated tagging (adding covers, deleting, saving, etc.), may result to slower playback performance of the file. Solution is to simply remux it with MKVToolNix, not FFmpeg.

With slower machines like Pentium 4, the lag or slow response time, and then the player's quicker performance after resetting are noticeable.

view more: next ›