Look at the chart in the article. Let's say actual ability is x and perceived ability is y. The graph effectively asks us to compare the difference between perceived ability and actual ability, which we can write as y-x. Thus, the chart effectively graphs y-x over x, which can be written as -x+y over x. There is always a strong correlation unless y approximates x.
IMO, the conclusion of that analysis should be "Dunning−Kruger is a truism", not "Dunning−Kruger doesn't exist".
Like @shit (from shitjustworks, nice one) said, these don't conflict. While I didn't say anything about authoritarian (communism especially vanguardism is authoritarian and it never works out), I personally believe that modern China is right wing. For example, their current government wants to merge traditional values with law.
Thank you for helping to spread Chinese, Soviet, and ableist propaganda. Plus you didn't respond to that "probably" part.
I’m pretty sure you can’t just “delete” a subreddit
Wiktionary is a good resource for slang-y definitions.
It doesn’t have to be leftists, anyone who does that is a tankie.
The board said Grawe, who originally had her license suspended in November, neglected her patients as she livestreamed parts of their procedures, spoke into a camera and answered viewer questions — all while the surgeries were taking place.
The unnamed patient suffered severe damage to and bacterial infections in her abdomen, as well as loss of brain function from the amount of toxins in her blood, according to the notice.
I’m struggling to figure out how much of this is photoshop
Aren’t these sentences exactly the same
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect#Statistical_and_better-than-average_effect