They can try all they want. If it violates the Charter, it will never get past the debate stage before getting scrapped. There's no point in passing legislation that will just get thrown out the first time it goes to court.
Archangel1313
joined 2 weeks ago
You don't have to worry. There are already legal advocacy groups preparing to challenge it. It will never make it to a vote.
If it violates the Canadian Charter, then it won't pass the debate stage, which means it won't even make it to a vote.
This will never pass.
Oh, look. 400 traitors all in one location. Someone should be writing down their names. Just in case.
There's also a certain element of "You can't tell me what to do!"...followed by doing something incredibly stupid and self-destructive, just to "own the Libs".
This is yet another astroturfed conservative movement. This whole topic is only supported by a very small number of people, yet it's being amplified in the media in order to make it seem like a big deal. It isn't.
Definitely nothing corrupt about this. Aside from the quid pro quo, that is.
They already signed that contract. This is just Israel attacking them anyway.
This explains it in better detail than I could. It isn't so much a single law, but rather a lot of different laws that all work together to ensure that Israel is given everything it could possibly need for its own defense...even bypassing normal regulatory measures in the process, as long as certain conditions are maintained.
Israel has invested tens of millions of dollars lobbying for, and helping to write, the legislation that guarantees their continuous access to weapons. A lot of it is written directly into defense spending bills that are essential for domestic defense spending as well. So, without a massive shift in policy at the legislative level to disentangle those priorities, that support is legally binding.
Yeah, well...I certainly didn't detect any indication that he was planning on changing his direction, just because some farmers and service industry folks were upset about having their employees snatched off the job.
When people started acting like he was softening his approach, I went back and read it again, and still couldn't understand why they thought that. It really sounded to me like he was saying, "too bad for you...things have to change", not "I didn't realize this would hurt you...I need to change".
"Mayoral candidate kidnapped by group of armed, masked individuals claiming to be immigration agents."
FTFY.