Well, that's awfully vague.
Archangel1313
joined 1 week ago
When will Dems learn? they can't win without the progressive vote
Fuck that! There's way more MAGA voters than progressives. You gotta go where the numbers are. /s
"Procedural error"? As in, they accidentally allowed a progressive to win?
Maybe they aren't including the time spent scrolling. It's just the sphincter flexing moments that count.
Whelp. It appears I am a robot. I guess I don't get to find out what my fellow boys are up to. smh.
(Edit).. apparently I can't even spell "bots" correctly. I'm failing all the tests today.
Man, why are you even having this argument when you are this ignorant about what these terms mean?
Do you understand the difference between "lethal" and "non-lethal" in the context of basic crowd control tactics?
For that matter, do you understand the difference in classification between a "protest" and a "riot"?
And are you even aware of your rights in either of those scenarios, and what tactics the police are authorized to use?
Because if you don't understand these concepts, then you are simply bullshitting your way through this conversation. And at this point, it really seems like that's the case. If you do understand these concepts and are still making this argument, then you are being completely disingenuous.
As I said...if you aren't going to argue in good faith, then what's the point? You're just pretending to be stupid, at this point.
Buddy, you're the one not arguing in good faith, if you are saying that rubber bullets and live rounds are the same thing. If you don't understand the difference between lethal and non-lethal ammunition, then you're right...there is no point in talking about this any further.
That would be the definition of "law enforcement"...and that is illegal.
"Gay space communism" is my new favorite description for Star Trek.
Nothing you just said, even makes sense. Did that sound profound to you? Because it isn't. Wishing for war, is an idiots "fever dream".
"...what happens will happen", is bullshit. We either make it happen or we don't. Blaming the people in power for our actions is no different than them blaming us for theirs. The entire point is to not do exactly what they want us to, like sheep being led to slaughter.
So, by that logic, protesters should use violence? Is that what you're saying? I mean, if the police are already going to frame them, then we should just give them what they want, and turn this into an all out massacre?
Man, you guys are trying so hard to start a civil war. it's pretty transparent at this point, who you're working for.
Oh. This should go well, then.