BaumGeist

joined 3 years ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

No, i'm comparing learning about safe sex to learning about skepticism and critical thinking. Refusing firsthand experience with the cults that are ubiquitous won't save people from those cults, it will just keep them from developing the skills necessary to cut thtough the bullshit until they're suddenly thrown in the intellectual deep-end at 18.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, but people learn about it late (if at all), and we end up with lots of adolescents getting STIs/pregnant/etc.

What In the world are you trying to say?

America has a problem with sex ed because people don't learn about safe sex; many still learn abstinence only. This doesn't stop STIs nor teen pregnancies, it doesn't stop SA, it doesn't stop myths about men and womens reproductive systems from proliferating, it just defers the problem of educating people until later. Basically, America's sex ed is to avoid teaching people about sex, then hope they suddenly know how to have safe sex when they're 18 because they're 18.

Likewise, deferring learning about cults until they're 18 doesn't stop people from getting indoctrinated, it just expects 18 year olds unfamiliar with cult tactics to suddenly be immune to cult tactics because they're 18.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

I'm with Terence McKenna here: Culture is not your friend

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Not all religions are abrahamic

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Same place america is with safe sex: it doesn't solve any problems, just defers the issue of ignorance and learning until adulthood

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

Check out the mostly trans instance of https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Idk about the apps, but on the website a direct link like that takes me to another instance, so I can't subscribe (without making an account on that instance). If you do the shortlink, it takes everyone to the community via their own instance:

[email protected]

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Good point. DM me your address, and I'll respect your life by using all the parts of your body after I thank you for your sacrifice

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

The sanctity of life. All life is sacred and must be treated as such. Even non-human animals, even plants. We should be working for a world where all living beings have their right to life respected and preserved.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Donct ypu realize the end of the world is nigh, and also bad things happen that cause sadness, and therefore our species should stop procreating until nothing bad ever happens again?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

While you are explicitly correct, the implication is that institutions deserve respect by virtue of being institutions. Respect should be earned, or rather, given until proven unworthy. I refuse to respect an institution that fails to acknowledge the sanctity of life, much less fulfills the needs of the people it governs.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

People who drink cow milk are exploiting another sentient being

1
Bruleain (lemmy.ml)
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
 

Finally, another web engine is being developed to compete with Chromium and Firefox (Gecko), and they're also working on a browser that will use it.

Here's the maintainer talking about the current state of the project, and a demo of the current functionality

 

I occasionally see love for niche small distros, instead of the major ones...

And it just seems to me like there's more hurdles than help when it comes to adopting an OS whose users number in the hundreds or dozens. I can understand trying one for fun in a VM, but I prefer sticking to the bigger distros for my daily drivers since the they'll support more software and not be reliant on upstream sources, and any bugs or other issues are more likely to be documented abd have workarounds/fixes.

So: What distro do you daily drive and why? What drove you to choose it?

 

It's the series finale for our friend Plague Roach. Big props to Drue for all the work he's put into this project

Here's the full series playlist on youtube

 

As a user, the best way to handle applications is a central repository where interoperability is guaranteed. Something like what Debian does with the base repos. I just run an install and it's all taken care of for me. What's more, I don't deal with unnecessary bloat from dozens of different versions of the same library according to the needs of each separate dev/team.

So the self-contained packages must be primarily of benefit to the devs, right? Except I was just reading through how flatpak handles dependencies: runtimes, base apps, and bundling. Runtimes and base apps supply dependencies to the whole system, so they only ever get installed once... but the documentation explicitly mentions that there are only few of both meaning that most devs will either have to do what repo devs do—ensure their app works with the standard libraries—or opt for bundling.

Devs being human—and humans being animals—this means the overall average tendency will be to bundle, because that's easier for them. Which means that I, the end user, now have more bloat, which incentivizes me to retreat to the disk-saving havens of repos, which incentivizes the devs to release on a repo anyway...

So again... who does this benefit? Or am I just completely misunderstanding the costs and benefits?

 

Most people are aware that gasoline sucks as a fuel and is responsible for a large portion of carbon emissions, but defenders love to trot out that "if every end consumer gave up their car, it would only remove like 10% of carbon emissions"

I can find tons of literature about the impact gasoline vehicles have, but is there any broader studies that consider other factors—like manufacture, maintenance, and city planning—while exploring the environmental and/or economic impact of cars and car culture?

I know there's great sources that have made these critiques, but I'm looking for scientific papers that present all the data in a single holistic analysis

 
view more: next ›