Darukhnarn
Since when should country size play a role in government support? There are planes ffs. If your military can operate in the middle of a desert with no utilities, you should be able to support a stable civilian management in rural places.
I’d call that a failed state of the haven’t even got government firefighters. What other basic necessities don’t they have? Are streets also subscription based?
As if. We are “digitalising” our government office right now, and have to file all incoming or produced documents physically still…
To be frank, that’s the fault of most of the worlds forest management systems. You get what the article calls „new wood“, when you raise trees in open spaces. There they can rapidly expand and grow, and be felled early on. If you see forestry as plantation circles, which most of the world still does with those enormous clear cuts, you will get this kind of growth. However, if you raise forests in a more adaptive model with focus of the individual tree and a constant management, you can still manage to produce wood that is like the „old growth“ shown here. The trick is to keep the natural development of the forest in a stasis, where you take out just enough trees to promote the sprouting of new trees, but can control the rate at which they grow. This varies of course from species to species. Ideally, you have a specialist administrating the process and monitoring the appropriate amount that can be felled.
Acacia
That’s the biblical way!
Don’t worry: they will sell you purified air soon enough.
Not every judicial system is built on retaliation. Some are built on rehabilitation and a secure society.
If there is one thing that you can rely on it’s German bureaucracy to be precise in it’s documentation. So I’d trust the numbers here generally….
If you can opt out of it, it’s not a tax. It’s an insurance. Taxes pay for everyone.