Again, I understand the sentiment but this is not an example of them "getting away" with anything.
If anything this is indicative of a healthy Quality Management System given that this condition was identified and contained prior to any impacted articles entering into service.
Look I'm all for the "Fuck Boeing" circlejerk but as someone who actually works QA at an aircraft manufacturer this is likely a whole lot of nothing.
I'd be shocked if you could find a single aircraft of any make in service that didn't have dozens of misdrilled holes.
Without any context this is just fear mongering.
I know, definitely managing my expectations cause of that. Will be interesting to see how he performs relative to Yuki at least.
Really looking forward to seeing how he performs this weekend, hoping he performs in line with all the hype surrounding his Sim work and test time in the Red Bull.
So the general consensus is that these power ratings are a fuckin joke right?
Rough go of things for de Vries but I'm excited to see Danny Ric back on the grid
Norris on hards defending against Hamilton on softs was some serious driving. Hell of a day for Lando.
A Wand of Wonder I gave them early on has provided my party with some hysterical moments.
Yea it's a good question, I'm definitely guilty of it myself. Unsure how best to address it though as the convention is to post articles with the headline verbatim as the post title. Do we change that and just post articles with a spoiler free summary as the title?
How incredibly whelming
I think I'd like the chrome better if it was cleaner and more minimalist but with all the sponsors all over it just looks cheap imo
This just isn't true. Part 121 operators develop and manage their own maintenance plans. That is done in conjunction with Boeing and the FAA but their maintenance plans may very well deviate from Boeings prescribed service and intervals per their standard maintenance manual.