This website is filled with people who were banned for just that. Check out /c/Reddit ( pretty sure it's on lemmy.world)
So yea, it's happening, and is exactly what you were replying to. Calling that moderation is a pretty far stretch.
DoPeopleLookHere
joined 1 month ago
I'm gonna need an EU law citation there.
Because banning people for upvoting the word Luigi isn't EU law.
That's not what they're asking for. They're asking for the ability for it to not generate that sentence again.
Sure, but are you suggesting they somehow encoded, falsely, that they were a murder?
Because it's very unlikely.
It fabricated this from no where. So there's nothing to delete. Because it's just a response to a prompt.
Your still placing more intent and facts into those processes than actually exist.
You cant even get it to count how many letter p are in the word apple. At least not last time I tried.
That storage your talking about isn't facts. It's how sentences are structured and what they "mean".
As for the output "meaning" it's still just guessing what you want to hear. No facts involved.
It's not unreadable, it doesn't exist.
The responses are just statistically what sounds vaugly what you want to hear.
They can erase the chat responses, but that won't stop it from generating it again.
Generative AI doesn't start with facts and work from there. It's just statistically what you want to hear.
So the general tailscale actually uses peer to peer wiregaurd connections. Headscale is the middle point to negotiate these wiregaurd connections.
So none of the traffic moves through the VPS.
As for a VPS itself, it's noore unsafe than your local bare metal. It's still an application publicly exposed and needs basic precautions like fail2ban or crowdsec
You say that likes it's a bug, not a feature.
It's has its place for sure.
But the physics are far more against satalite.
But the reason I don't believe in large scale satalite systems for consumers is because they're disposable. They all fall down or contribute to the growing space junk problem.
So it's not really any better at the end of the day than just burying a fibre cable for 40 years.
Because building space ports and rocket launches have 0 impact as well.
But you acknowledge this, so what's your point? Why pay a techno billionaire when we can publicly fund cables way cheaper and more friendly?
If we can figure out how to put them on the bottom of the ocean and pipelines over just about any terrain, I think we can figure this out
view more: next ›
Okay, still a non sequiter then, because that law has nothing to do with what you responded. Which was the point of getting that law, because no where does it call the actions you replied to moderation.
And for all I know your a Russian troll so have fun with that.