I don't now about insiders or today, but I've been buying the dips and I have made more money this year than I did all year last year. It's fucking awesome.
But hey, if you wanna hold out and boycott just because ya hate Trump, feel free. Doesn't bother me at all. As long as ya all keep panic-selling, I'm golden. :)
Sooooo glad I bought everything I could when market crashed a bit ago. Stocks, crypto; it’s all been on sale. I've been buying in every dip.
This admin is making me so much money! Love it!!
Ugh, I probably have it purchased thru my school. I forgot to check link to make sure it was free access. I'll delete. Sorry!
I know. :)
Of course you're saying that. Lemmy has 4 fav words to describe scenarios that they disagree with: Nazi, Fascist, Sealioning, Strawman.
If you are having such a hard time reading half a page (not 18 pages) of text refuting what you say, then I can't help you. I know that's sooooo much reading.
Because hey, it's not a Minecraft map. I understand it's hard for ya.
Let me TL;DR it for ya: Shit is ok when YOU do it, but not ok when the other side does it. Classic Lemmy.
Hey, now throw the other 3 lemmy terms at me. See if that changes my mind! Go on... I'll help ya. Nazi (tho I didn't write nazi stuff on a rock and leave it in a Jewish neighborhood like the Nazi in the article), Fascist (tho I didn't write nazi stuff on a rock and leave it in a Jewish neighborhood like the Nazi in the article), and Sealioning.
Wait, was this too many words for ya too? Oopsie!
Well I reported you for being a bootlicker. Have a great day under your regime.
Well, luckily for me it's not against the community rules or TOS to lick boots. It is, however, against the rules to advocate violence. I hope you go cool off and get the help ya need.
I’m saying you would normally call your sort of post virtue signaling, because the only time your virtue signaling ass cares about a hate crime is when a liberal does it.
Alright, let’s go with your logic. You're calling this "virtue signaling." But remember how, a year ago, when a conservative did anything involving Nazi imagery, and people called it out, conservatives would say, "You're overreacting, it's just virtue signaling." And you liberals said, "Nope, this is real. These people are Nazis and fascists, and calling it virtue signaling is just making excuses."
So now let’s flip it. Imagine someone placed a brick with a swastika and the word "Nazi" on a car in a Jewish neighborhood. But instead of it being a Tesla, let’s say it had a Biden/Harris bumper sticker. Would any of you call that “virtue signaling”?
Hell no. You’d say it was a hate crime, and you'd be rightfully outraged. And if a conservative showed up and told you to calm down and stop “virtue signaling,” you'd tear them apart for defending Nazi behavior.
But now that it's a Tesla, suddenly your side is calling it virtue signaling?
If it was wrong to minimize it as virtue signaling back then, it’s still wrong now. You don’t get to flip the rules just because it’s your team doing it.
In fact, just recently on Lemmy I have seen many MANY comments saying, "If someone shows nazi imagery, or if someone supports someone doing nazi imagery, then they're a nazi."
Well here is someone who painted a rock with nazi imagery. And placed on a car in a jewish neighborhood. Using Lemmy logic, that person is a Nazi. Probably a fascist too.
And brah, if you support that person...well you know what Lemmy says about people supporting Nazi's...
Hey, here's an idea: How about not painting Nazi symbols on anything. Ever. For any reason. Try that.
Now in your defense, I do agree with your last part. If she just left a piece of paper, no nazi imagery, and just called the car owner a tool, and said she disagreed with Teslas, that'd be ok. I mean, she'd be a bitch, but I'd be ok with it.
Nazi imagery is never cool. Regardless of context or "protesting." It's a hate symbol.
What do you mean? Can you explain a little more?
Painting swastika on something, in a Jewish neighborhood, and leaving it for someone to find is a hate crime. Disgusting. She must be a Nazi. She even signed the brick, "Nazi." So gross!
Hope she has to pay the price for that. Also, why is she hiding her face? If she was proud enough to commit the hate crime, then she should be proud enough to show her face while answering for it.
Yep, dude just wasted his life and will have a criminal record for the rest of his life. And in 10 years, no will even understand what he did. And he didn't change the course of politics or anything.
Lemmy will be happy to mention him as a hero tho! LMAO
From the article: A 13-year-old Missouri middle school student was suspended for sharing a photo of his weekend art project on his private Snapchat account. The student, W.G., and his mother Riley Grunden are now suing the school district, principal, and superintendent for violating W.G.'s constitutionally protected First Amendment right to creative expression and for labeling him a "cyberbully" on his permanent record.
I hope they win their lawsuit! That's a lot of overstep.