Edwardrotik

joined 2 years ago
[–] Edwardrotik 3 points 3 weeks ago

Which is pretty damn glorious

[–] Edwardrotik 8 points 1 month ago

Not because of quality, but I had the horrible luck of running into a woman at a couple swap party that had white supremacist tattoos. I noped out, grabbed my partner, and left.

I'm not talking a little thing that might have been a youthful mistake, I'm talking a back piece, neck to ass and all the way across, nazi crap.

[–] Edwardrotik 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I wouldn't call them tiny at all, but they also aren't huge. They're lovely though :)

[–] Edwardrotik 1 points 1 month ago

Tbh though, that's not sloppy, they're round and plump and delightful

[–] Edwardrotik 4 points 1 month ago

Oh, I dunno, I guess if they're into the daddy vibe, it would feel pretty good. But I'm not into guys, and if I was, I'd be a top

[–] Edwardrotik 1 points 1 month ago

I'm fairly sure the fishnets would flex a little.

[–] Edwardrotik 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Bold of you to assume we need to rip a hole ;)

[–] Edwardrotik 1 points 1 month ago

I very briefly dated a kqueen at one point. Can't say it was that fun. I very much enjoy all kinds of things, including group play. I enjoy a fair percentage of my play to be dominance related. But the whole cuck scene is very difficult and demanding, while also being boring. It's such a narrow kink

[–] Edwardrotik 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm a guy, and not into guys. But that is a great pic. You obviously took some time and effort to set it up, and it was well spent.

[–] Edwardrotik 19 points 2 months ago

I have a "rule"

I will gladly enjoy what someone shared in scale with the apparent intent of the material.

So, a pretty woman sharing a clothed picture (even if the clothing is very sexy), isn't something I'm going to enjoy on a sexual level. I might think for a bit that it would be nice if she shared more than that, but that's where it ends.

If a woman shares a picture of her in clothing, but does so while saying something like "guess what I look like under this", that's a direct invitation to fantasize.

This means that the regular selfie on your profile isn't something that would normally lead me to sexual thoughts. And it didn't this time because the way you asked the question was interesting enough that I wanted to think about that rather than enjoy the implied permission to enjoy it sexually via fantasy.

I've never been the kind to sexualize pictures of women that weren't already sexual. I have no idea why, but even bikinis and lingerie pics never seemed sexual to me.

Don't get me wrong, I very much enjoy such pictures! But it's more the way I enjoy a painting, or someone dancing. It's beautiful, but not sexual for me.

Tbh, I don't even assume outright nudes are sexual any more. I used to, but when all those celebrities' pictures got leaked years ago, it made me rethink that. Now, if I know the person didn't share the images, I avoid them. If the picture looks like they may not have intended to share it with everyone, it's the same thing.

Not sure if you wanted that kind of response, but that's my take on things. You're very pretty though, and if you ever decide to share more of your body with the world, I'm quite sure they will make fpr wonderful fantasies.

[–] Edwardrotik 1 points 2 months ago

Yup.

He had had some kind of injury that left scarring and bent it like that

[–] Edwardrotik 4 points 2 months ago

Same reason boogers are. And mucilage.

Protein!

You suspend some proteins in some water, and you got glue

view more: next ›