Emotional_repeat_554

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

I'm not sure what your contention is... AP is not even supposed to claim anything. They verify information with sources they consider reliable. You can just claim anyone they reference is unreliable.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

Multiple news outlets are now reporting that it will, in fact, be going through the refuge based on available mapping.

The government's motivation is questionable.

https://apnews.com/article/border-wall-biden-immigration-texas-rio-grande-147d7ab497e6991e9ea929242f21ceb2

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago

Exactly right. There's always claims of some 5d chess about moves like this that aren't even discussed on most mainstream media that voters are exposed to.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago (8 children)

How does any of that negate what the center of biological diversity is saying?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Ironically, Biden has been shying away from debates...

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So your argument is literally "both sides"... I thought both siding was frowned upon