FlowVoid

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Billions of invertebrates and other small animals are killed during tilling before planting, with pest/weed control during the growing season (even with "organic" or "natural" compounds), and of course during harvest.

This is inevitable, planting requires controlling soil and plants, and this will inevitably kill animals that you don't even see. Do you really think you can pull a weed without killing any of the invisible animals living on it?

Fishing/hunting also kills animals, but you can catch a fish or hunt a deer without restructuring an entire ecosystem. Which means you can feed yourself without killing quite so many animals.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Billions of animals are killed wherever crops are grown.

Even if you are entirely vegan, animals have to die if you want to eat.

In fact, if your food is grown on a farm then you are probably contributing to more animal deaths than someone who obtains food from hunting or fishing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Well if you put it that way, then I guess animal cruelty isn't as bad as we thought.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Freelancer 2

We can only dream of Freelancer 2

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I doubt it was much of an added expense. The search was carried out by Coast Guard and Navy personnel, who would be getting paid regardless.

If the sub hadn't gone missing, it's quite likely their time and resources would have been spent on practicing some sort of rescue mission.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

That's equivalent to one metric bag.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I agree about logging IP addresses or emails.

But I am not so sure that usernames or nicknames are necessarily identifiers. For example, if someone posts as "IamtherealTomHanks", you can't actually identify who they are.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

True, but it's important to note that personal data means identifiers such as name, date of birth, location, etc. Comments on a blog, by themselves, are not personal data.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This is a good article on whether non-EU websites have to obey the GDPR. It boils down to two criteria:

If your business is offering goods or services, irrespective of whether a payment of the data subject is required, to such data subjects in the EU

or

If your business monitors the behavior of EU citizens and their behavior takes place within the union.

The latter includes use of advertising cookies, location tracking, etc.

If neither of those apply, you can probably ignore the GDPR.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

The Trans-Atlantic Data Privacy Framework (and subsequent executive orders) protect the EU citizens from misuse of their data by US law enforcement and intelligence communities.

They do not give EU citizens any rights concerning data held only by private companies, apart from the rights all Americans already have.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

That agreement concerns use of EU data by the US government itself (ie the intelligence community and law enforcement).

It does not give EU citizens any opportunity to enforce claims against US companies in US courts.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago

There is no treaty. And the GDPR is not "law" in the US. You cannot sue a company for damages in the US like in the EU.

However, there is an executive order that allows you to file a complaint if you think your privacy rights have been violated.

You can find a good explainer here.

view more: next ›