Funkytom467

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Quebecois are too close to the US, you guys know what it's like. So I give you that it must be a more common thing to happen to you.

But we on the other hand would never even consider origins like an American.

Not only that but a lot of us hate Americans, and most of us have some chauvinism.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 2 months ago (11 children)

I'm French, ain't no way a french community doesn't fall for it, this might be the easiest one to troll.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Yeah it's not easy. Societies are often multicultural, and each culture doesn't restrict individual values or smaller communities within it.

I wouldn't say it's just for the powerful, it can be a tool for the people too. The powerful do manipulate it for political reasons but ironically they themselves are mostly amoral.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It's not just a concept we invented, but also a concept that only apply to us.

So I think the moral universe refers to a morality that would apply to any of us, throughout nations and cultures.

Wich I don't find particularly far fetched since despite our cultures we do find a lot of common ground in our condition. It's the basis for human rights for example.

Although I wouldn't say that cultures shouldn't have an impact to on morality. There's definitely a mixture of both...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It's not supposed to represent waves at different angles.

Rather it represent an axis (the one on the right) for each frequency of waves that is contained in the signal (on the left)

Here the signal is made up of two different frequency waves and the graph on the right is there to show the value of thoses two and their respective magnitudes.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

I don't know when we started using the word.

But switch is more about dom/sub. Whereas vers can be just about who penetrates who.

Just like top and bottom it can be a bit ambiguous sometimes between the position and the fetish.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 months ago (7 children)

It's when you can be both top or bottom

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

If Nick Furry was the down talking voice in my head I'd be ok with it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

To be honest it's not just patriarchy anymore.

Nowadays conservative agenda serves the elite only.

Meanwhile this controlling hurt most mens as well. Pushing them to only value themselves through work, to repress feelings for productivity... all of it makes for more servile workers.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

In a universe that expand at an accelerated rate.

Watch out if you keep talking astronomy and i'm gonna ask you out!

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 months ago (3 children)

The rock ain't floating, it's falling with some speed sideways.

And the absurdity of the universe, in wich your biomechanical functions are part of, shouldn't impact the value we make of us.

view more: next ›