Goldmage263

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ohhh, such a relaxed bun. Very much at odds with how violent and energetic I'm sure they actually are.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ty, ty. No talking about pets without paying the pic tax. One back for you.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (6 children)

;_; I can't see any kitty pic

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Happy you could join! You'll find that not only are bans much more reasonable, but conversations are frequently downright pleasant. Aditionally, there are communities built just for calling out mods that abuse power or are heavily biased. The system here is working much better from a user perspective.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Like what? I get wishing things never got to the stage they are at, but what do you wish a bunch of unorganized hackers did earlier? Genuinely curious as I'm not good enough at coding to think of any creative "solutions"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

I love being able to read the tour guide at my own pace rather than have it said to me. These structures are great.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

I'm considering paint spalltering within the hypothetical that the federal agents are aggresive and risking harm to others. People get hurt and killed with their "non-lethal" methods. I would gladly go to jail for a time if it saves a life.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

In the same way I would advocate the crime of going over the speed limit while passing someone on a two lane highway, yes. I believe the American people have much to learn from French protests.

Edit: Or another crime example would be feeding homeless people. Just because it's a crime doesn't make it immoral.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

I prefer reading fiction myself. That's partly why I keep upvoting posts in this community.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Pre edit: Oh, lol. I just typed this out and realized you were the same guy from elsewhere in the comments. Feel free to completely disagree with me, but I'm leaving this here for others that want to read and think.

There are a lot of great answers to the question, how about this one.

When the USA spent 6.5 billion anually (started with George Bush) it prevented 20 million people from being able to spread HIV each year. This includes to children that would be born with HIV. Now you might not have the empathy to consider investing that for foreign adults and children at the cost of double what just Elon Musk got last year in government contracts, but let's change from HIV to the next Covid. What would happen to the rate of infection globally if 20 million more people from some of the poorest countries became vectors of a highly contagious deisease? That sounds like a problem for the USA to me.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Yup. That does sound racist. Mentioning black names and a court docket together in an example leads me to think inherent bias exists in the commenter.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Yeah, pretty sure the racist part is that you correlated black names with court dockets as a made up example. A school roster or something would have been a neutral example. You may just have some personal struggles in this area. Not saying things is a very good way to avoid sounding racist but not a good way to confront our personal biases. <3

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

I didn't actually watch it. No idea if it was good or not.

view more: next ›