Based on the window flashing/framing shown, I'd wager not a super long time nor terribly well insulated. But $7,500. A significant number of them is likely to get destroyed no matter how well built, so optimizing for cost is probably the right choice.
I do wonder why they're not made like "strip malls" or designed to connect with an enclosed cavity between. That would substantially reduce the area of direct outdoor thermal interface.
I'm no expert on international trade relations, but this feels like a meaningful reciprocation of our earlier outreach. It's heartening.
"Don't assume a specific individual isn't among the 30% who tried" isn't a "both sides" argument. Neither is there any pragmatism in proactively excluding someone who might already be your ally, nor in purity testing those who wish to be.
No matter how angry you are today, that anger will fade. I hope your decisions are being driven by something more steadfast.
The principle remains: judge the group for its collective behavior, but don't stereotype the individual.
I'm not terribly familiar with Brazil's politics or economics, but I'd wager they're implying the hazards of becoming a direct, unambiguous threat to (external/private) capitalism. Canada's not too big to become a banana republic, if enough forces get behind manufacturing consent for ~~war~~ special military operations.
It's "linguistic repositioning" at its finest.
I'm sure Modi will be delighted to join a coalition against authoritarianism. India would make a pretty tenuous ally -- to put it mildly.
Maybe men should start supporting each other. You know, as long as admitting to having feelings isn't too gay or whatever.
I was waiting for some context like this before forming an opinion. Thank you for surfacing it.
The article seems to be rather incomplete. Just off the top of my head I notice the absence of anything regarding foreign affairs at all, let alone tariffs, and no mention of sales tax, national defense, food safety and supply management…
Presumably, it's pruned to focus on the things people confuse. But these days that's likely to include foreign affairs and trade. I don't think premiers are normally anywhere near as involved in that as currently, and I don't have a solid understanding of provincial authority there myself.
Earning condemnation from Campaign Life Coalition is an extremely low bar. Case in point: even Poilievre cleared it. I don't know what could possibly warrant even mentioning the opinion of a gossamer-masked hate group.
As always, but only when the other side is in power.