General Sherman craves to wander the southern lands once more.
Hype
People who don't want to solve the problem, they just want their turn on top.
I've noticed that too. The compartmentalized nature of Reddit only exists becuase of the size of the communities. I've seen lot of people copying subreddits and also filling them with links to the top posts on that subreddit, meanwhile they are getting no comments or engagement. Lemmy should not act as a mirror hosting website for Reddit.
Next they will announce that they are suing Disney because he watched the History Channel, and that had violence on it which contributed to his actions.
Low pay
Buying school supplies with their own money is common
Actively abused by the school kids
Actively abused by the parents of school kids
No support from the administration
We don't use that word. Corruption and bribery sounds icky.
Try lobbying instead.
Many people don't realize that the first colonies were founded by Christians that believed the churches in their home county were not being authoritarian enough. The wanted religious freedom, sure, but they wanted the freedom to be theocratic like you said.
Trump didn’t transform shit
Picking and choosing what parts of the Bible they want to follow is nearly as old as the religion itself. The first council of Nicea was the first large attempt for Christianity to define itself and create a canon. That happened in 325 AD. Even if we talk only about protestants, denominations are all about what parts of the bible they follow and how they translate the word to doctrine.
To attribute it to one man is so disingenuous. Christians have been interpreting the Bible in whatever way suits them best for over a millenia.
The FBI serves the government, not the people. Reporting things to the FBI as a citizen only works if what you are reporting aligns with the current goals of the FBI. If the government is ok with what Twitter/X is doing, the FBI doesn't give a shit. Behold the highly effective ~~bribery~~ lobbying system.
I'm a bit confused. Of course, if the parents are not supportive then them needing to approve the "nickname" is a problem, but if the parent is supportive, isn't this good for parents becuase it give them more control over the school. If the parent approves of the nickname, the school has to recognize it and refer to the child by th name.
I agree it's taking control away from the kids, but is it not giving full control to the parents?
Fuck, somebody tell Savannah, Georgia. This is gonna be messy.
No no, it's not "trolling," they call it alternative debating!
A sad bunch, the lot of them.