https://web.archive.org/web/20140314230825/www.youtube.com/watch?v=dW8XorD9RwI
I took the quotes from the HTML file, though, because the drop-down didn't work. The description is the same as today.
https://web.archive.org/web/20140314230825/www.youtube.com/watch?v=dW8XorD9RwI
I took the quotes from the HTML file, though, because the drop-down didn't work. The description is the same as today.
I've read this yesterday, and it's kinda weird.
The community says they've debunked his cheating and needed months to do so, going through every possible seed to determine that the dungeon in the video doesn't exist and the very important and early item drop is not naturally possible.
But the video description reads weird, it stated that a) it's a spliced run and b) he manipulated the item to drop as early as possible.
...done in 27 segments appended to one file...
...cut down the time almost in half and it's due to even more luck manipulation...
...The most important thing is that I manipulated Naj's Puzzler to drop from the earliest monster possible...
Note that I took these from an archived shot of the video in 2014.
Oh cool, now we can namedrop Schrödinger into this to give an even more educated impression.
But as we know from other franchise films that tried to subvert their mythos a tad, or at least deliver some narrative swerves, as “Star Wars: The Last Jedi” did, fans sometimes don’t want bold swings.
Weird words to describe completely butchering the hero of the previous trilogy.
Could someone educate me on the possible damage clicking a link can bring, assuming I'm not interacting with the website any more than that?
Not doubting there's damage, just curious. I'd think they'd get some maybe usable info from fingerprinting or something? Could javascripts lead to more serious problems?
Was intereseted as well, their movies sum up to 1.17 billion box office (according to wikipedia).
While specific platforms haven’t been named in the law, the rules are expected to apply to the likes of Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, and TikTok, per the Prime Minister. Sites used for education, including YouTube, would be exempt, as are messaging apps like WhatsApp.
I think they meant twitter is worse than reddit and hope we don't get an influx of twitter users.
Huh, thanks for clearing that up.
So what exactly is the implication of that description, that the run was made with a fixed seed and maybe multiple tries for some of the levels, but on the same seed?
Isn't it then extremely suspicious, that it's not stated what seed was being used / how it was fixed?