Even though it's something that's technically correct on a philosophical level for SOME outlier patients, and in an ideal world and ideal system we could implement it well, I don't think our system is anywhere close right now. Working in the healthcare system I don't know anyone who's eager for this or who knows how we're going to sort through the massive haystack of innappropriate requests this will trigger, to correctly identify the few " needles" that it's actually ethical for.
Jesse
joined 2 years ago
Can you link that quote? Curious what the source is?
I don't know what you think science is but this is not it. Your experiment is like building a go kart and acting like you're on par with auto-industry engineers.
And they'd be starting and stopping all over the place, so the kind of acceleration needed to reach that speed would kill any known organic being via g forces before they'd even suffer from the fire. But he's one of the fae, so data on them is lacking I guess.
Absolutely braindead on the part of the league once again. Hope this gains lots of media traction and they're forced to answer even more uncomfortable and embarrassing questions about it.
Why is no one choosing 7? Xray vision is absolutely going to be super useful. After that its a tossup between 2 and 3.
What are fuck pants? If they rule as much as kilts and tunics I want some.
I know it's not the point of the question, but remember whatever happens is 100% the villain's fault, not yours.
Looks like an N value of 1 though. Hopefully results are replicable. I'll wait for the meta-analysis.
Yikes. You've painted a vivid picture of the mindset that most people are in when they get addicted to drugs. Even if what you're using isn't inherently addictive thats a vulnerable place to be in. Hope you can find some healthy sources of help.
It might not be quite as futile, but this feels like asking how far you need to throw starfish into the ocean to stop them from washing back up on shore :P
view more: next ›
Thank you