Kitathalla

joined 4 months ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Always tourniquet the neck, I say. Fastest way to stop the screaming. Bleeding stops pretty quick afterwards, but it's a shoehorn for the screaming.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Sure, why wouldn't they? You can't really convince me that 'taking away' ownership from the founder is a big deal... by the time a company's net worth is high enough to give him a billion dollars worth of stock, that company has far more than just him alone making the company worth that much. You also can't really say that the janitor is less of a deal than any other random employee and thus deserves no stock... It takes everyone to make things work.

As to the actual 'value' of the company, and therefore the owner's worth? Ask him how much he wants for his shares, and he is forced to sell at that amount for say, the next 6 months if people want the stock. This prevents him from giving a ridiculously low value and gaming the system so he doesn't have the net worth he truly does, because it would trigger a rush of people buying the stock for such a good deal, and it also prevents him from giving a ridiculously high number to manipulate people into buying stock, as it would push the net worth too high.

Would that idea work for every company? I know there would be issues with implementation. Is it the owner that gets asked the stock price? The board? A shareholder meeting? The employees of the company? Each would have its downsides, and manipulation possibilities.

I don't know, mate, these are just things off the top of my head. I'm sure with some serious thought from people much more in tune with these concepts than I am, we'd have a good framework to go off of.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yup. It's why the scams by phone are so irritating to most of us, as another example. It's just obvious and a time waster, but by making the scam easily visible to people who have the characteristics to not be vulnerable to them, it weeds out all the false positives the scammers would then have to deal with. They don't want you, mr. bright eyed and bushy tailed, who is ready to catch them out only after hours of trying to get you to give them the code to your gift cards. That's a lot of wasted time. They just want granny who will follow every direction.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Is that an 'interesting' area? I drove by once and thought the namesake was neat.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well, yeah. The only way to get it is from contact with an infected monkey, or something that has recently contacted them, like a needle.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

As a matter of fact, yes. I was talking to a vet at a friend's wedding, and he casually mentioned that working with simians is a dangerous field for many reasons that you wouldn't think of, like their herpesvirus strains killing us.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

You... really don't get it, do you? The person being tormented is the one who isn't doing anything. That's the joke. Look around him. You've got bubbles being blown, which creates the sound of a person blowing right near your ear and the sound of the bubbles popping. Then you've got the hand organ down the bench, and across from him you have the paddle ball on string, and someone knitting. All are repetitive, eventually-going-to-drive-you-crazy sounds, much like the slow dripping of water is not terrible in anyway, but comprises the chinese water torture.

They might all be little demons in disguise, or merely figments created by the devil, but who cares? We know they're not persons being punished, because they could stop at any time if the action was a torment.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Does it? The whole joke is about annoying, repetitive sounds being created near the fella who is being tormented. It seems like a coincidence far more than a reference. I would have expected a tell to draw attention to the reference, like maybe a castle, a butterfly, or a dawn to link back to the lyrics... you know, something besides just four words that happen to be in a song somewhere.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

I was wondering what new one was out. The subtext of 'little-noticed' seems wildly misleading. Also, I wonder who is into rocketry these days? I haven't seen them in my local hobby shop for at least several years.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

But it took a few years to take effect. It was the whole, 'the new tax breaks go away, but not for the corporations.'

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Morally? No. From the perspective of nothing on the internet is ever deleted? Yes. People who get duped into sending nudes will often find (I mean, IF they ever find, realistically, seeing how big the internet it) their picture being used by someone else for another duping operation.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (6 children)

It's like the misspellings in the phishing emails: it ensures only people who will fall for the trick will respond. If some model messaged you out of the blue, you're more likely to be suspicious or you feel that you're super attractive and a model might actually reach out to you. Either way you're more likely to not bite on the bait.

view more: ‹ prev next ›