Pretty revisionist of you. No one saw the success that Baldurs Gate 3 had. They literally moved up their release date to avoid it getting drowned out.
The head of Larian has even said that they did not anticipate this many sales.
Was this going to be a good game? Yes most people could see that.
Would it reach a mainstream pocket and sell as well as it did? Most people did not predict that.
Cool. I was pretty interested in it. Hope you find something else.
Eh, I really didn't think about it too much, but not to spoil anything, but that decision does come back up later with consequences so it makes sense.
But also, when has Bethesda had great writing? This has def been the biggest gripe with them for a long time now, and it's def not the strongest point of the game lmao
Oh shut up, it's releasing day one on Steam. Show me a first party game that is also releasing on a different marketplace on Day 1. Quit crying. It's not like they are forcing you to buy an Xbox.
Or shit if you really wanted you could even just buy a month of gamepass and stream it to your TV/phone.
If training models are considered IP then shouldn't we allow other training models to view and learn from the competition? If learning from other IPs that are copywritten is okay, why should the training models be treated different?
The sequels are not perfect by any means, but 1-4 had me at full attention throughout and then slowed down after that for me. 2 is so short though I really lump it into Book 1 in my head.
Just trust him bro. Govt bad, okay?