Maaxorus

Mon-keigh just functions as a sort of slur for non-eldar, most commonly used for humans in-universe, there's not really much further subtext. It is similar to the actual human word monkey to invoke a sense of arrogance, but it's changed cuz it's just not exactly kosher to refer to people as monkeys irl (even though scientifically speaking, humans are monkeys).

Apart from that, it's mostly just a reference to this

I spin my dice like beyblades, actually

It's actually the arcane spell list from Pathfinder 2e

Oh BOY. So I'm currently playing an automaton character in a Strength of Thousands campaign (pf2e), and I'm playing her very much like a stereotypical robot: no emotion, strongly rational, all that good stuff. One thing that I've made core to the character is her ability to learn and grow, but I don't like the idea that a lack of emotion is a flaw that needs to be overcome. So, my philosophy is "make her become emotionally intelligent, not emotional".

Sadly, I think with the way I play her, people would anthropomorphize her hard.

Razira's about to go all Monty Python on these fellas.

💚💚💚💚💚

Oh, these bitches gay! Good for them, good for them!

Yes, I very much enjoy seeing them. Also konsi is by far the most huggable goblin I've ever seen.

Duly noted for the future, thanks!

Perfect, thanks dude!

Kirby kills gods on a regular basis, there's no doubt in my mind that Kirby would either absorb it into his being or obliterate it completely.

How often are we gonna have this conversation? Becoming an Oathbreaker is not the same as breaking your oath. If you actually read up on how you become an oathbreaker, you might understand why it's an evil only subclass.