MrMobius

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Well, think of WHO as the 'least bad source of information", not the absolute truth provider. To get closer to the truth, you'd need to do a bit of journalist work: do a background check on the scientists involved (what have they published? Is their work respected by their peers? Have they been approached by lobbies?) and compare different sources (for instance, look at what the Robert Koch Institut in Germany and the Institut Pasteur in France have to say). But, to do that you might need to speak several languages, but above all, you would need a lot of time for research. So checking the most reliable source is generally the practical course of action for most people.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Really? That's a bit too… intense. I propose "postpone-baby-pill" or "baby-no-thanks-pill".

[–] [email protected] 70 points 1 week ago (18 children)

It's called plan B in the US? We call it "the morning-after pill" where I live. I think it's a bit more self-explanatory.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Like mathematician August Ferdinand Möbius, at 77, in Leipzig?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (7 children)

You should take everything you hear on the internet with a grain of salt (including here). You should really trust the guidelines of your country's health ministry or the WHO. Then again, the WHO has said some crazy shit in the past…

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Good enough, you're hired!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Well, citizens living under democraties should really start to realize that human rights need to be protected continously. Once we let our guard down and take them for granted, that's when authoritarians are able to dismantle them one by one.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

My dream is to start a co-op bicycle shop/worshop once I finish my mechanic traineeship. But the other trainees don't seem to share my vision, they only care about making lots of money…

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

True, there is some amount of gun violence glorification in the US. And it's completely sane to be angry at your oppresors, but it needs to be channeled into something productive. Killing CEOs is just gonna make them pressure governments to increase repression with armed police and global surveillance. Violence begets violence, so it should only be used as a last result.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

My point is, using the opportunity to open the debate on the complete despair of people oppressed by private healthcare is the way to go. Let's just not make this about revenge on the rich CEOs involved. Removing their privilege is revenge enough.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

Well, some people took it a bit too far. I get the message that health insurance companies are hell, but applauding murder… Are we better than them if we do that?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

I asked because I'm a bike mechanic trainee. And And this job would have taken me a few days, I'd say. 😅 And finding specific, out-of-production parts can be a hassle indeed.

 

There are a lot of papers advocating for a switch away from fossil fuels, and even H2 fuel cells, to ammonia based propulsion in transport. It can be used in combustion engines but there's a risk of NOx production. So the greenest option to me is ammonia to H2 conversion or direct ammonia fuel cells. It's got the same advantages of classic H2 fuel cells but without the constraints of cryogenic or pressurized containment of H2. And ammonia has a better energy density. But it's toxic for humans and, above all, marine life! Especially for fish species. So I'm feeling a bit uneasy about potential mass ammonia spills…

view more: next ›