Really? That's a bit too… intense. I propose "postpone-baby-pill" or "baby-no-thanks-pill".
MrMobius
It's called plan B in the US? We call it "the morning-after pill" where I live. I think it's a bit more self-explanatory.
Like mathematician August Ferdinand Möbius, at 77, in Leipzig?
You should take everything you hear on the internet with a grain of salt (including here). You should really trust the guidelines of your country's health ministry or the WHO. Then again, the WHO has said some crazy shit in the past…
Good enough, you're hired!
Well, citizens living under democraties should really start to realize that human rights need to be protected continously. Once we let our guard down and take them for granted, that's when authoritarians are able to dismantle them one by one.
My dream is to start a co-op bicycle shop/worshop once I finish my mechanic traineeship. But the other trainees don't seem to share my vision, they only care about making lots of money…
True, there is some amount of gun violence glorification in the US. And it's completely sane to be angry at your oppresors, but it needs to be channeled into something productive. Killing CEOs is just gonna make them pressure governments to increase repression with armed police and global surveillance. Violence begets violence, so it should only be used as a last result.
My point is, using the opportunity to open the debate on the complete despair of people oppressed by private healthcare is the way to go. Let's just not make this about revenge on the rich CEOs involved. Removing their privilege is revenge enough.
Well, some people took it a bit too far. I get the message that health insurance companies are hell, but applauding murder… Are we better than them if we do that?
I asked because I'm a bike mechanic trainee. And And this job would have taken me a few days, I'd say. 😅 And finding specific, out-of-production parts can be a hassle indeed.
Well, think of WHO as the 'least bad source of information", not the absolute truth provider. To get closer to the truth, you'd need to do a bit of journalist work: do a background check on the scientists involved (what have they published? Is their work respected by their peers? Have they been approached by lobbies?) and compare different sources (for instance, look at what the Robert Koch Institut in Germany and the Institut Pasteur in France have to say). But, to do that you might need to speak several languages, but above all, you would need a lot of time for research. So checking the most reliable source is generally the practical course of action for most people.