Noblesavage

Great observation.

You asked for examples and sources - I gave examples and 2 sources. Maybe it's drastically different where you live?

My challenge to you is - what are you doing to change the narrative where you live?

Anyone can sit from the sideline and comment that nothing has changed since these protests took place - it's a lot harder to get out there and make the change happen. Maybe you're already making those changes already, in which case - keep going!

Do you think that the needle has moved in a positive direction since these protests? Even if it feels like only a few millimetres?

Starting from the bottom of this list: 5. There's more women in the workforce than ever before https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/75-006-x/2022001/article/00009-eng.htm 4. We've seen a drop in poverty since 2017 (but it's climbing back up!) https://www160.statcan.gc.ca/prosperity-prosperite/poverty-pauvrete-eng.htm 3. As a direct response to Trump, Canada elected a Centre-Left Prime Minister in Marl Carney's Liberals when the election was decidedly going to be a Rightwing landslide with the Poilievre's Conservatives. 2. Green, renewable energy has never been more popular.

1. There have been significant reforms since the George Floyd protests. Some cops have seen prison time, or lost their jobs entirely.

That's not to say our job is done and everything is a utopia now - we still have a lot of work to do. However, we do need to acknowledge when things have moved in a good direction or we'll be overwhelmed by the bad and lose hope.

You've gotta see some of the good through all the shitty headlines that want to make you click and feel bad.

Ever since Tom Nicholas' video criticising Veritasium's channel, and then how Veritasium handled the criticism after in the comment section... I haven't really watched any of Veritasium's video anymore.

https://youtu.be/CM0aohBfUTc

Excellent! I love a boycott where I don't have to change anything I'm already doing!

It takes a lot of strength to change what was probably a core part of your identity - I respect your change.

I agree. We're not the first ones to point it out, but theres a strong argument to be made for graphical style over graphical fidelity. Working to achieve a particular stylised choice tends to give a visual medium greater longevity.

There's a reason why people remember details about Jurassic Park over something like Avatar; or Star Fox over the latest Call of Duty.

Technology has made some things look better over the years, but the things that really get remembered visually are the style choices.

Just because one game takes up a quarter of your hard drive doesn't make it more impressive than a sub 1 GB game.

Patient gamers unite! I wait until that game I want hits AT LEAST -75% off.

The only exception I've had for that rule for myself in recent memory is for Monsterhunter games.

You look hard enough (or maybe not very hard at all) and you can see which developers and companies can't do launch days very well, or release too early. Blizzard/Activision, CDProject Red, Ubisoft, and Microsoft come to mind.

It's the smaller to mid-size companies that have something to prove that release something more polished. Not always the case, but you've gotta stand out somehow.

I'm still rocking my Zotac 1060. I might as well ride that thing into the ground at this point.

Thinking of your Superman example and an ubermensch having to think about everything, I think several comics and media that have explored aspects of this idea.

I remember reading that there's a Spiderman story arc where it's revealed that Peter Parker is holding back his "true" strength for nearly the entire time he's been Spiderman. It's only been his true strength of character that has made sure that he "pulls his punches" far enough back so as to not kill or harm the people he's fighting or saving.

I also think about Robert Kirkman's Invincible comic/animated series that explores how powerful people decide, either intentionally or accidentally, the fates of those around them, often with dramatic and violent conclusions. Invincible is the story of Superman if Clark Kent wasn't raised by an American family in the mid-West and was instead raised for another more sinister reason.

Great. Now you're just making me rewatch allinall's animated video of Pelinal's slaughter for the 30th time: https://youtu.be/E5ix0_W-ouI?si=-2mGt8TDnU5wbwGO

That's a good point about the "AI as a service" model that is emerging.

I was reading that NaNoWriMo has had a significant turnover on their board die to the backlash against their pro-AI stance: https://www.cbc.ca/news/entertainment/nanowrimo-ai-controversty-1.7314090

I'm not familiar with drone laws in the US, but in Canada (and from what I'm understanding from the article and other people's comments) drones are regulated by the federal government and also classify drones in the same way as airplanes. To be able to be a certified drone pilot you also need to know a lot about piloting an aircraft and we get some training in that regard to be able to be certified to fly drones. How we are supposed to fly a drone is similar to flying a plane in some respects, and we need to know how planes with people in them stay in the air. Don't get me wrong, we are not "real pilots" in any way, shape, or form, but we're flying in the same airspace as real planes full of real people. If we fuck up a flight - there can be very serious consequences for a drone pilot. Revoking our pilot certification, hefty fines, and even jail time.

On the surface of things, it might just look like property damage of a drone, but, as people have said elsewhere, we can't have people shooting drones out if the air when they feel like it - this could set a dangerous precedent where simple "property damage" of a drone could cause harm or even kill someone, or many people.