PapaStevesy

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

"No" what? I didn't ask you any yes or no questions, I asked you to relate whatever the hell it is you're talking about to what I was talking about, which you have failed to do yet again. And you're a liar, you said you weren't gonna read this.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Don't forget sesquipedalian!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Yeah, that's their point.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (6 children)

What "slam" though? Why not just press the clutch down? I've driven manuals before and definitely didn't have to do any slamming of the pedals, it worked great.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Lol, you do realize you debunked your own claim by the end of the paragraph, right?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Lololol it started with my single point and then you changed the subject so you could...flex your in-depth chemistry knowledge on me I guess? But without actually making any salient point, so I'm left, as you say, yammering on to what is essentially a brick wall.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (4 children)

At least I gave one, even if it was sarcastic. Once again, all you offer is non sequiturs and haughty derision. I guess I just want to know what you think this discussion is about, because all I've gotten out of it is vacuous meta-argument trollery.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (6 children)

Mmm yes, because "double downing" is a phrase an educated person uses. Got it, lolol.

Look, I would totally accept that I was wrong if I knew what you were referring to, but I literally don't know, you haven't explained your opinion at all. Like, please! Tell me what you mean! What am I wrong about?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (8 children)

Seems like something a hazmat DOT fleet manager would already know though, so I guess I just don't know why you're asking that. And truthfully, I don't particularly care, as, again, I fail to see the relevance. I mean like, if it's real chemical kinetic information that you're after, there are innumerable better sources than the comments section of a meme page on a fringe social media platform. If you're trying to make a point about my original tongue-in-cheek comparison, feel free to make it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (10 children)

Ok? That's neat, I just fail to see the relevance I guess. A god would be harmless too, if it was isolated from the rest of the universe.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (12 children)

Well, we call it chemistry, but the forces at play existed long before we even knew to name them.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 10 months ago (15 children)

God is like oxygen—highly volatile.

view more: ‹ prev next ›