PubSubSwitch

Health and safety are definitely a pretty clear line for when fetishes become taboo. Like if someone is into choking that's one thing, but if they want to pass out that feels disturbing.

I'm not into Daddy/Daughter so I can't really say, but does it feel similar to how people call their partner daddy/mommy to you? Like I can get down with calling my wife "mommy" but she doesn't like it so I don't call her that. But even for me it's just the mommy aspect, her calling me son or a child feels weird. That's not part of it for me.

I mention is because this is a good example of what I was trying to describe in the past. To me, someone saying "I have a daddy kink" or "I want to be called daddy" all feel much less taboo than "I have a daddy/daughter kink". I guess because it feels similar to pedophilia (I'm not saying it is, just trying to work out why I think people would treat it as taboo). That said, as a man being called "daddy" by a woman is basically them saying "I'm your daughter" in a sense but it feels like folks don't want to treat it the same.

This definitely feels like a fetish and also definitely feels like it crosses the taboo line. Assuming you're not just shit posting (lol), are you interested in using eel shaped toys with a partner or is it just a fantasy?

A site admin did intervene. What do you mean?

Related: https://lemmynsfw.com/post/166318

SOURCE??

What the Evony ads promised

Now kith

I'm not subscribed to that community. It's not my thing. I'm not into Loli either. Frankly, I do see a problem with Loli. I guess to me it is because the Loli "excuse" of "she's actually 3000 years old but just looks like a child" but then they proceed to portray them exactly as someone would portray a child. They (generally, I'm sure someone has counter examples) don't portray them as some wizened elderly woman in a child's body. That's why Loli generally feels disgusting to me.

Age verification is the correct thing to do. In the broader internet where things are less strict I'm sure you can find actual underage actors (who are possibly even being trafficked) where it could be avoided with proper age verification. Frankly I think that's just a super important thing (even apart from this specific discussion). An assumption I'm making (and I guess everyone is) is that the admins' age verification is adequate. So, assuming it is, I don't see a problem with allowing creators who appear young to make NSFW content of themselves. If it's not adequate then there's a much more important discussion that needs to be had. Based on some of the sticky posts over the past few weeks it seems like they're serious about it.

To your point, a lot of content makes my skin crawl. I just ignore it. If there's any I think is actually illegal I'd report it. Maybe I haven't seen the specific ones you're talking about so maybe that's why I don't feel the same way. I briefly went to the community when I heard about this and just now to see what the fuss was and it just seemed like legal but youthful looking people. Or just folks in their mid twenties just trying to look cute or wholesome. I didn't see anything that makes me feel the need to report anything as CSAM. That's just me. I believe you should report content you think is CSAM, I'm not trying to say you shouldn't.

I know I said it before but I really do view this whole thing similar to folks who may not understand forms of kink are consensual. It's not a one-to-one thing, but it is similar. Seeing a consensual rape-play session may make people question what the fuck is happening and may make their skin crawl. But if everyone is consenting then it's fine. I understand why people would have a hard time accepting that (especially if they themselves have been abused).

Why do you care if an 18+ year old who looks youthful does NSFW stuff? Take an extreme example, what if Hasbulla did nudes? He is 21 but looks extremely young. I can't see how telling him he isn't allowed to make nude content because of his appearance is anything other than ableist and body shaming. You don't have to like the content or even like the people who would look at it to think the content is acceptable.

If everyone is a consenting adult then everything is fine.

I believe their argument is that the community is a gathering place for stuff that looks like CSAM as opposed to any of the content looking like CSAM or not. I'm not agreeing or disagreeing, but it's important to represent people's arguments correctly.

[email protected] is the community mentioned in the Matrix chat screenshots which Ada (from Blahaj) has said are accurate.