Saik0Shinigami

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Everyone is still butthurt that he said a bad word one time. And for some reason he's a Nazi (citation needed that they can never provide).

/shrug

Edit: Oh and that one time was like 8 years ago.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 hours ago

Does anyone know of lemmy instances without as much censorship?

If you run your own, you can just undo the moderated action. I do that often on my instance just to see it without having to trawl through a modlog. But you should be able to also see it in the Modlog if you look there, can even filter by username.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

And I'm addressing your statement that "an IP address is 4 bytes" in specific. I understand their example is IPv4, but you just blatantly said that "An IP address is 4 bytes" when that's not the case for IPv6 which a good chunk of the world is using now (still not a majority though...).

His code takes the base64 of anything that's returned in both (together) ip and timestamp. So the long string is both values concat'd then encoded. Most of that string is going to be the timestamp...

Specifically MTEuMjIuMzMuNDQ is 11.22.33.44
Where ---KIApTdW5kYXksIDI3LUFwci0yMDI1IDE1OjA0OjM5IENFU1QK is the date string Sunday, 27-Apr-2025 15:04:39 CEST.

While it's still a "bigger" value than it needs to be, it's not like it's the end of the world for an email address. I mean, if we really want to get "fancy" most people don't know that you can just go to an IP address in it's decimal form...

1.1.1.1 -> 16843009 (http://16843009) No need to encode anything special at all in that case. But that's neither here nor there... Can always make your own with blackjack and hookers of course.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 14 hours ago

I’m not sure why you’re arguing in bad faith

I love how everyone says this the moment they're challenged with anything remotely against their bullshit.

What process of law was not provided to this woman? Everyone keeps saying this but nobody has been able to articulate any singular item that the deported woman was due that she didn't get.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

An IP address is 4 bytes

IPv6 exists you know?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

How unique! You must be so proud that you were able to string those words together.

Edit:

So my response to ad hominem is troll are you sure? I wasn't sure.
I bet you're okay with them telling me that I like to taste boots.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Incorrect. Healthcare could already have been addressed by the mother in Honduras. They do have hospitals and cancer treatment facilities.

And nothing stops the mother from re-petitioning correctly to return to the USA, unless she committed some felony crime. So not sure why everyone is under some belief that she would be unable to return.

I feel like very few people who comment here have ever been through the actual process to enter the country properly.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's really not.

If you're claiming that "they" is just the mother. She should be deported, she's in the country illegally just as I would be if I was in any other country illegally.

If your "they" includes the child, then it's a bad faith argument as the child was not deported.

But instead of actually communicating clearly, you just want to claim that my response is BS, when it's not.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

If my response to you was in "bad faith" then your logical leap for me was also in bad faith. The previous poster claimed that ICE is in direct violation of the constitution. Then you followed up in claiming that they're skipping due process. YOU brought that up. Now I ask for this case here what did they skip that would create a situation where a constitutional right was violated?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Nah, you lot are just as rabid as the MAGA people... You can't understand nuance and discussion.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The child wasn't deported. The mother was, and the mother chose to bring her child with her. The child was not deported.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

The father is illegal so if he showed up competition he’d be arrested and sent away too.

Not according to the articles I've read. The "father" (quoting because it's still unconfirmed) was supposedly a citizen. But with reporting as shitty as it is, this could be a bullshit "fact" just like the claim that the 2 year old citizen was "deported".

they were checking in to their immigrant center and going through the legal steps and still got taken away

ICE had final deportation orders... that usually means that the process was pushed to completion. Court case and all.

view more: next ›