Even worse, he is headed up. Why is he looking down?
Slatlun
joined 4 years ago
I would do it from the top (flat) with a guide. I would probably start with a circular saw, go until the front bumps the wall and finish the last parts with another tool. This allows the front and top to look straight which is all you'll see
You can cut cheese with a wire. Imagine having a thin piece of metal through a hole in your ear with weight on it. Your lobe is the cheese the ear ring is the cutter.
Ah, that makes sense
How does a driver choose how close someone follows them?
Yeah, let's keep testing if living soil with a variety of nutrients is better than inert growing medium with nitrogen injected.
- In my experience creamer is meant for coffee/tea. It is not the same as cream. I think it even has less fat than half and half. I would check the nutritional labels against the dairy equivalent to see the comparative fat content. If all else fails, you might be able to find coconut cream in the canned food section.
These are real, current legs. The front 2 of the insect norm of 6
This was kind of cool https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsg81Tn3s28 I didn't like the first wall example because the clicking cadence changes, but the field and trees were very clear
I absolutely agree that there should be a official name. My problem with birds is that there are 2 official names. The American Ornithological Society approves both of them (kind of). One is Latin/Greek/whatever in Genus species format - that is the one for science literature and taxonomy. The other is in English and silly in my opinion because that's where people will use it to say nonsense like there is no such thing as a seagull.
There are weirdly rigid common names around birds. There is a whole thing about renaming them right now. They are essentially regulated terms that low level pedants respect. They are the same types of people who would correct you for calling Frankenstein's monster 'Frankenstein'.
The plant community is better. You could call a "sunflower" a "tall flower" and nobody would care. You might get a "oh, I've never heard that one" but never "there's no such thing as a 'tall flower.'" They just fall back to the scientific names when clarity is important.
IMO common names should just be useful. I will call any gull a seagull when talking to non-bird people because that is a term that is commonly understood and how effective communication works.
Verwenden Sie dafür einen Online-Übersetzer, also verzeihen Sie eventuelle Fehler. Dabei handelt es sich um eine Trauermücke. Es hört sich jedoch so an, als hätten Sie einen Plan dafür. Wir haben auch Kieselgur auf der Oberfläche des Bodens, Bodenbewässerung und klebrige Fallen verwendet, um sie etwas unter Kontrolle zu bringen.