TauZero

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You absolutely do not have the right to post a sign like "No Hispanics" at your restaurant, under current US law (Civil Rights Act of 1964). You do not have to wait for an actual hispanic person to show up and be refused service to be liable - the presence of the sign alone is already in violation and can get you fined or imprisoned. You cannot claim "This sign is just for decoration as an expression of my 1st Amendment rights, we would never actually enforce it." In this way, the Civil Rights Act already does abridge your right to write any sign you want, ironically in direct contradiction to the "Congress shall make no law" language of the 1st Amendment.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

*Yawn!* Wake me up when they stop requiring phone numbers to sign up.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fox the broadcast TV channel is different from Fox News the cable channel. Broadcast TV is operated by one of ~100 local affiliates and shows the Simpsons and local news. Fox News Channel is the Murdoch personal project to produce 24-hour conservative propaganda to shift the national discourse. Or at least it was this way 20 years ago, haven't seen what the TV branding looks like nowadays.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

An atheist living in Saudi Arabia absolutely has the right to walk into the public square and shout that god does not exist. They just have to be willing to accept the consequences of execution as a result.

Stating a fact of physical ability does not contribute any additional information in a discussion about legality.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (8 children)

My last comment got downvoted for saying I have never watched Fox news 🤷🏾.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Try out the jetpack list on tvtropes in the "video games" tab: https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/JetPack

For example Dangerous Dave (1988) fits your description: video timestamp at 8m35s

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The graphics looked incredible for its time, it was miles ahead of any other racing game. I just now realized the tracks are actually FMV! The camera doesn't follow the car but the middle of the track, and splits at any fork. Neat trick! This way most everything is pre-rendered, with all the lighting and dynamic shadows and the like. Only the cars and obstacles are rendered in realtime, on top of the video. Cool how they managed to integrate it all together seamlessly!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Exactly! Trying to think outside the box in a trolley problem is like wishing you could wish for more wishes in a genie problem.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Excellent excellent!

If 6 is rolled, then P(X|R=6) = (N-1 choose 9)/(N choose 10)

Might as well reduce that to 10/N to make the rest of the lines easier to read.

If you don’t flip it, you have a 2/3 chance of dying.

There is also a chance that your switch is not connected and someone else has control of the real one. So there is an implicit assumption that everyone else is equally logical as you and equally selfish/altruistic as you, such that whatever logic you use to arrive at a decision, they must have arrived at the same decision.

No matter what your goal is, given the information you have, flipping the switch is always the better choice.

That is my conclusion too! I was surprised to learn though in the comment thread with @pancake that the decision may be different depending on the percentage of altruism in the population. E.g. if you are the only selfish one in an altruistic society, you'd benefit from deliberately not flipping the switch. Being a selfish one in a selfish society reduces to the prisoner's dilemma.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Street space is a public good. It is literally land, surface area to be used for something. You can't create more of it short of demolishing all the existing buildings. Right now like 80% of the width of a Manhattan avenue is dedicated to moving and parking cars. Pedestrians and bicyclists are squeezed into tiny slithers on the sides. It's a total shame. If you count and compare the number of people passing a given point on a 5ft busy Manhattan sidewalk to the number of passengers in private cars in the 55ft roadway next to it, it's like a 10-fold difference in 1/10th the space.

Right now, everyone poor and rich at least has an equal access to drive on the roadway (assuming you can afford to maintain a car at all). However, midtown roads are already at full capacity all the time. There exist way more people in New York who would drive if they could, but they literally can't fit. It takes 1-2 hours to drive into Manhattan. This is considered "typical traffic conditions". Morning rush hour stretches into the afternoon and merges into evening rush hour.

Effectively, you are trading patience/time for the opportunity to drive in. For every one person who has the patience to wait 1 hour in gridlock, there are 2 more who do not and find alternative ways in. Even billionaire mayor Mike Bloomberg took the subway to work. It was described as "populist signaling" but it was literally faster for him than taking a limo.

Rich people have a lot of money and not a lot of patience. Lots of them would have loved to be able to pay to skip the gridlock, but they couldn't, until now. They have succeeded in taking this 80% of public space, that everyone with sufficient patience could access, and turning it into a private toll road. That's why this is a land grab! Doesn't matter if the fees go into a public fund - if revenue was needed it should have been raised by a progressive tax. A flat fee is the opposite of that!

The congestion charge will not even decrease the number of cars on the road. Remember how for every 1 driver there are 2 more who wish-they-were-drivers but who had more money than time? Every 1 poor driver taken off the road will be immediately replaced by 1 more private car service Suburban SUV. The rich crave travel away from us poors, in their padded armored tanks, and now they can do exactly that, as they have succeeded in having the legislature kick us off our public land.

The only thing that will reduce car traffic is shrinking the roadways. Take those 5-lane Manhattan avenues, take away one lane and convert it to protected micromobility lane. Take away another and widen the fucking sidewalks! Take away the street parking and convert it to green space with trees that survive longer than 1 year. Add loading zones for delivery drivers. Use the public street space for the benefit of the actual public!

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

New Yorkers who think this is another poor people tax

Oh hey, that's me. Have never watched Fox news or read New York Post, and I believe this congestion charge is a literal land grab by the rich. AMA.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

there’s no way to know which track the trolley is on

It's a standard trolley meme problem, the trolley will keep going on the main track unless the lever is switched 😁. I thought !science_memes would be familiar with trolley problems, but I guess I get to introduce some of you! You might want to start off on some easier trolley memes first, this is advanced level stuff.

where the real lever sends it

There is not usually ambiguity with the lever. If you wish, you can have an announcement in the headphones "main track... side track..." every time you flip the lever. Your only uncertainty is which track you yourself are bound to, given how you're blindfolded.

there’s a 0.017% chance

1/6 * 10% = 1/60 = 0.01666... = 1.666...% ~= 1.7%! Careful there!

It’s not really a trolley problem, because in both scenarios a track is empty,

Everything is a trolley problem.

view more: ‹ prev next ›