I thought I had finally found a healthy drink I liked with no artificial sweetness and they had to go and fuck it up
Whatever country this is from has bullshit regulation.
I'll give you one guess....
Thatoneguy
joined 2 years ago
Unless it's mixed with erythritol
Those are both their Dead Billionare product and they do both have caffeine. In the old can design it was just listed somewhere else not shown
Honestly I didn't try that hard. I don't live there anymore nor do I know anyone or anything that is still there so who cares if people know I guess
I would if it wasn't my employers credit union which would give away too much information about me
No this was legit. This was a mortgage inquiry form on their website and one of their lone officers called me soon after
504
Area code blocked for privacy but it is spoofed from my phones number which I have not lived there in many years
I think I finally have it all figured out. I was previously using corectrl to monitor and adjust the GPU but lact has so much more info and adjustment. I immediately saw the card flapping between clock speeds under load. I applied the only high clock speeds setting and that all stopped the voltage stayed constant. However and this is why I didn't realize with corectrl is that the card was now thermal throttling causing an undervolt condition. I went in cleaned out the dust bunny's, dislodged a sata cable from one of the fans and relocated some hard drives for more airflow. The card now runs at a toasty 85 under load which from my past amd experience is perfectly fine. Thank you for the help kind stranger.
Apparently in the newer versions the resolution is auto detected but I was able to change the pixel density to match my screens and it worked thanks for the help!
So I did end up installing that and eventually got it working but I am having this issue where when I am in Google maps or waze I can not pan the map or open and map search or menus. I can still open the Android auto menu and switch apps etc just an issue with maps have you experienced this?
Considering the image at least as uploaded here is 960x660 and assuming the top panel is about 1/4 the height that means each picture is about 768x330 or 253,440 pixels which is way less than the claimed differences. But if you convert it into bytes at 160kb it would be approximately 1,338,163 per side and if you convert it into raw 1s and 0s that gives a much more believable 4,282,122 bits meaning there's about 550,000 bits that are the same which I would think would be the real challenge of finding.
....and now I'm late for work