TingoTenga

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The image output themselves might not be protected by copyrights. However, that does not mean that there are no rights over the code (or prompts) used to generate those images or over the database compilations themselves (https://www.copyright.gov/reports/appendix.pdf).

 

Hi! This is a bit of a newbie question, so please bear with me.

I purchased a laptop that has a specific hardware issue under Linux (the keyboard does not function). A patch fixing the issue was approved for 6.8 and incorporated in the "stable tree" of older kernels: 5.4, 5.10, 5.15, 6.6, 6.7, etc.

My question is: Do distros ship with an updated kernel that incorporates all the patches? Or does the user need to update after installation for the patches to be applied? I imagine that it may perhaps vary from distro to distro, but I honestly don't know.

The question is relevant for me because, potentially, I would have to install the actual distro and update, rather than just try out a live version.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I do not think that you can shoehorn existing copyright laws to AI-generated art. It's not an apples to apples issue.

While there might be certain creativity and effort that is worth protecting in some gen-AI art cases, it does not require the same kind of skill, materials, time, effort, cost, and dedication that copyrights were envisioned to protect with more traditional works.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago (5 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Knees are also too sharp.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 years ago (6 children)

I loved Voyager, but I always hard a little bit of a hard time with Neelix.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Tempest Rising is looking very reminiscent of Command & Conquer games. Worth a look of you like the genre.