Zacryon

My wife explained this beautifully to me with this video: It's Not About The Nail (Youtube, 1:41)

Ditch Google trash. Go for alternatives. E.g., Firefox instead of Chrome.

I can't no. But other people can.

We can already create meat in a lab. Milk is coming as well.

See for example: https://www.forbes.com/sites/daphneewingchow/2025/02/24/first-lab-grown-whole-cows-milk-to-debut-in-the-us/

It's never too late to start doing something you love.

Apart from that: fuck capitalism. It suffocates the (non-capitalistic) personal development and freedom of virtually everyone.

Shh... don't make us feel bad about our pathetic lifes.

If I may rephrase it: Art can be created by an AI only if it has agency and self-awareness (or, more general, conciousness).

Is that necessary though to create art?

Quite a loaded philosophical question, but an important one if we want to talk about the essence of art and the beings – either natural or artificial – that create it.

Do you think animals, apart from humans, can create art?

By that definition, those without a (known) sense of self-awareness or conciousness, couldn't. And yet, we can see behaviour that we would call "art". Be it a bird, which mimicks sounds or invents a dance to impress females, or a fish that draws patterns into the sand for similar reasons.

And by what definition would an advanced AI be "alive" enough to create art?

So if we would create milk in a lab, which is chemically identical to e.g. cow's milk, but without any udder secretion involved, that wouldn't be milk?

What is milk if not just fatty water with a couple of nutrients?

Our concept of "milk" goes beyond mere mammary gland secretes.

"real art". Gatekeeping art now, are we?

Why do you have a picture of my wife? /j

Also from oat.

Or motorcycles in the street in front of your house/apartment. It's so fucking annoying.