Zeth0s

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I was never downvoted more on reddit as when I said that LTT videos are catchy and entertaining but often technical superficial or even wrong. And the thumbnails were insufferable.

It looks like my opinion is becoming more mainstream.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

Hydrogen and oxygen burn explosively. It wouldn't last long

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Do you have some number about that? It's a big claim that majority of working italians are against it.

It must be improved, but the idea was correct. Something similar exists everywhere in Europe

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 years ago (3 children)

What's the reactions? Proton battery sounds like a media-friendly name for a hydrogen fuel cell?

Is it a H fuel cell?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It requires continuous expansive improvements. It is like real world. Building a system robust to frauds works on the short term, but on the mid and long term is impossibile. That is why laws change, evolve, we have governments and so on. Because system reacts to your rules and algorithms, making them less effective.

And these continous expensive improvements are done daily, but it is a difficult job

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

It is not at the moment. Models are built on the assumption of stability, i.e. that what they are modelling doesn't change over time, doesn't evolve. This is clearly untrue, and cheating is a way the environment evolves. Only way to consider that, is to create a on-line continous learning algorithm. Currently this exists and is called reinforcement learning. Main issue is that methods to account for an evolving environment are still under active research. In the sense that methods to address this issue are not yet available.

It is an extremely difficult task tbf

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Out of curiosity what model did you use?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Do you have examples? It should only happen in case of overfitting, i.e. too many identical image for the same subject

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

It's a slippery slope. What about consultant developers that worked on the codebase of photoshop 10 years ago, whose code is still used in the current version? Do they deserve a percentage of the subscription? And architect who designed it?

This is the reason studios can do this, because the contract was very exceptional, and they want to make it similar to any other industry, where freelances and employees do not share any long term revenue

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Can anyone access all and popular? I was curious to see the reactions but they are unreachable

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

They don't remove bugs, but it is easier to solve them without having to wait for some random guy to answer on stack overflow.

I don't know now (I haven't asked a question in ages) but to get a good answer on stack overflow it used to take weeks sometimes

GitHub issues are usually more useful

view more: next ›