activistPnk

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

I can understand the /fuck lawns/ ideology in some specific contexts, like lawns that are in water-starved regions. But I don’t get the across the board blanket stance that all lawns are always a bad idea.

What about buffalo grass lawns, as opposed to blue grass? Or whatever kinds of sustainable grass species that do not need to be watered artificially for a given region?

What about use cases like turf for dogs and kids to play on?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Downtime by a freedom-respecting trully decentralised node like slrpnk.net really exposes how Lemmy clients leave a LOT to be desired.

The prospect of data loss is gutting. A proper client would be syncing threads of interest between the server and my PC, so during downtime I can still at least locally access past content. No proper clients exist for Lemmy.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

Indeed. The instances that have solid uptime have, in most cases, sold their soul to the devil (aka Cloudflare, which is a centralised threat on the free world and all things good).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

For me, rats are filthy, gross, and creepy. But that is not why I fight them. I normally would not care about their presence as long as they stay on their side of the walls. But I fight them for two reasons:

  • Their teeth never stop growing. So they are teething their whole life and also build nests, which means non-stop house destruction.
  • They can carry hantavirus. It’s an airborne transmission and can come from rat urine and feces.
  • The day I decide to remove my ceilings (likely to take away rat turf), I expect to get a shower of feces.
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I’ve heard that as well; and claims that they are essential to keeping the sewer pipes clear. Not sure to what extent I would put stock into all that but they are certainly a pest. Disease, filth, destruction of homes.

My city ultimately considers them a pest considering there is a tax-funded public pest control office fighting rats year round. People can call them and they will come to the home and deploy rat control measures (usually poison) at no cost, just like a pro exterminator.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Would be useful to plant a specie that attracts rats, so the trams can cut down the rat population.

 

Sometimes a gmail user sends me an email. I object to that. In principle, I need be able to tell Google that I do not consent to them processing my personal data whatsoever.

If one of their users addresses an email to one of my email addresses, I do not want Google to store the message or even transmit it. They must refuse to handle my personal data, and thus refuse to process email traffic involving my email address.

I believe this falls under GDPR Art.18 or 21. But the question is, how can I submit my GDPR request to Google? I can write them a letter but I do not want Google to get my address. I don’t even want Google to know my name. The only thing I want Google to know is my email address, so that Google’s mail servers can refuse mail to that address. But the mere act of submitting a GDPR request inherently requires data subjects to prove their identity to data controllers.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Whoever told you that was feeding you bullshit.

Who told me what? What are you talking about? I know my machine was made in 2008 (which came with linux on it from the factory). Or are you objecting to my estimate that I can get 10 more years out of it? No one told me I could get 10 more years out of it. In fact people are shocked that a machine that old still serves me.

You’ve lost track of the thread. Your words:

I’m pretty sure you are writing from a device that has most of his fundamental components not made in Europe but the US.

It does not matter where the components came from on a 2008 machine. In 2008 ETS was not even a concept to me. You cannot retroactively boycott. I wish I could travel back 25 years in time and tell myself before Amazon became the evil that it is today to boycott Amazon. A boycott can only be practiced after you resolve to partake in the boycott. An ethical consumer can only be responsible for maintaining their integrity /after/ committing to boycott.

Think about it: we can’t make microchips, and most of the IT and media production we watch is made by US companies and therefore under the control of the US.

A Dutch company makes the machines that makes chips. That puts Netherlands in many supply chains. Of course gnu linux would have countless contributions from Europe as well.

Not sure about that. Do you use PeerTube?

I don’t produce videos with the exception of 1 video, which I published on PeerTube and not YT. It was trivially easy for me.

Think about it: we can’t make microchips, and most of the IT and media production we watch is made by US companies and therefore under the control of the US.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

If you can root your phone

Only certain phones. I tried several different hacks out in the wild for my version and they failed. It’s also an off-brand phone that gets no notice by any of the alternate OS projects so flashing is not an option either.

you can install whatever location mocking app from fdroid,

What exactly are you referring to? The stock AOS already supports mock locations. And I’ve used it. But not many apps are designed to make use of the mock location. I vaguely recall coming across an app that hacked the official GPS API to use the mock location in order to fool apps that are naive about mock locations, but of course that bit only works on rooted phones.

It’s a shit show all around. But in any case since not all phones are rootable, apps need to be written to specifically read the mock location feed as a GPS alternative.

Network based location is available via other ways, not just by the goog, if you install microg

I heard of microg before; looked into it, and went no further. I don’t recall what the problem was, but I vaguely recall that it still requires some kind of ties to Google.

(edit) MicroG is proposed as an alternative to playstore. I used to use Raccoon, a desktop app to fetch playstore junk. It still required a Google login to use Google’s API. The circumvention was to use a shared account. I imagine that’s also how microg must work. But I eventually decided Playstore garbage does not belong on my phone anyway. I will only use apps I can obtain outside of playstore.

or only its location part unifiednlp, you can get quick rough location from celltowers and even crowd sourced wifi based location, formerly collected by mozilla, nowadays by poziton.

If there is some way of getting that info using an unrooted phone that has been Google-neutered to the full unrooted extent, I would be interested. I could not remove most of the Google infra but I could disable it. I had it in my notes to check out Unified Network Location Provider and forgot about it. Thanks for the reminder.

My notes also mention this app, which only works on recent phones (not mine):

https://f-droid.org/en/packages/net.wigle.wigleandroid/

Not sure if that was the barrier that stopped me looking further.

In any case, there is still a role for old TomToms to play here. Using cell towers and wifi APs requires your navigation phone to have those radios powered on, which need energy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I agree. But you have to start somewhere. The guideline has been converted into legislation in Belgium since last week.

Do you have more detail on what was implemented? I could only find this repairability index, which I suspect won’t be much more useful than energy indexes and nutrition indexes.

 

A box of really old TomToms (softball sized) appeared at a street market a year ago, two for a dollar. I doubt anyone was interested in any and I doubt the seller would bother to return with them. They were probably be wasted.

In principle, old TomToms could be used to feed a smartphone. If you use a smartphone for navigation, these components compete to suck the battery dry:

  • the color LCD
  • GPS radio receiver
  • WiFi¹
  • GSM¹

(1) only applies to Google boot-lickers who enable location tracking in order to avoid the wait to acquire satellites.

The GPS is a significant drain because it’s heavy on non-stop calculations, which generates heat (wasted energy), and the heat itself hits the battery even harder.

We can do better. TomToms with bluetooth tend to suppot NMEA (I think). So the old TomTom w/outdated maps could be used purely to get a fix using its own battery supply, which it then transmits over bluetooth. So you toss TT in your backpack. Disable the GPS on your smartphone and enable bluetooth. Bluetooth is like 1 tenth the energy consumption of GPS. Then you enable mock GPS in advanced settings and run a FOSS bluetooth app that serves as middleware to feed the mock location.

The problem: OSMand and Organic Maps are both incapable of using mock GPS locations. And even if they add the capability, it would only be in their recent version which has already left behind older phones. (edit: well Organic Maps is not that bad… their latest version supports AOS 5)

Refusing to support Google means using airplane mode with location svcs off and being wholly dependent on GPS. And for whatever reason it takes me around 20—30 min to get a fix despite being in a large major city; every time. This must make Google happy. The old TomToms were faster at getting a fix. IIRC, they would take 20—30″ only the first time but quickly got a fix after subsequent power cycles in the same area thereafter.

Smartphones have the sensors to do inertial nav if you calibrate a starting point. But the apps don’t have their shit together yet. I vaguely a recall a FOSS app doing inertial nav, but not too useful if it results in a mock location that OSMand cannot handle.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

This is why I said at the local level. City council cannot change federal laws.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Also when people would dig through the piles they would often throw shit everywhere

The problem is that they are in piles to begin with. I have climbed on piles of appliance waste stacked ~5 meters high. These are not neat stacks but randomly dropped/tossed things which roll when you step on them. I fell once and got bruised but was lucky I did not get impaled. I’ve been kicked out of junk yards ½ dozen times.

The problem with the chain of disposal is the public tosses something out and the privately-operated metal recovery business immediately claims it as their property to be cashed in for its melt value. They immediately treat the incoming appliances as garbage. A middle step is missing. The middle step should not involve a massive pile of junk that is dangerous to climb. Large appliances should all be on the ground with space around them to inspect. The metal recovery business should not have a claim on the property before this middle step.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

The EU has been grappling with right to repair laws for over 10 years now. It’s a complete shit show.

At the moment, a washing machine maker in the EU is only required to release repair documentation to professional repairers who are insured, not consumers. And they only have to do it in the 1st 10 years, not in the time period that things actually break. At the 10 year mark, they automatically lose the docs and stop making parts.

The law you reference is not yet in force AFAIK. But when it comes into force and each member state eventually legislates, look at what we are getting-- from your reference:

A European information form can be offered to consumers to help them assess and compare repair services (detailing the nature of the defect, price and duration of the repair). To make the repair process easier, a European online platform with national sections will be set up to help consumers easily find local repair shops, sellers of refurbished goods, buyers of defective items or community-led repair initiatives, such as repair cafes.

That’s crap. It’s fuck all. Consumers are not getting service manuals. They are just being told where they can go to get someone else to do the work. We can of course already find repair cafes because they publish their own location. But repairers at repair cafes are just winging it. You cannot bring them a large appliance like a washer. They don’t even have water and drain hookups. And even if one repair cafe made an exception for large appliances, their repairers are not insured and thus cannot legally get access to service manuals.

Everything at the state/fed/intl levels is a total shitshow. This is why I asked in the OP what can be done at the local level.

 

IBM Thinkpads have a cult following in part due to not just a good design out of the gate, but the fact that the original designer refused to bend to pressure to change the design every year. The parts are interchangable to large extent between models spanning what, 3—5 years? The guy was under constant pressure; was told to give consumers something fresh by changing up the design. Luckily wisdom prevailed and he disregarded such reckless advice by responding with the mantra: ”if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it!

I’m happy to buy Thinkpads over 15 years old, often sold for ~$10 on the street, because if something is broken or breaks it can still be used for parts to fix other models of Thinkpads from roughly the same decade.

Lenovo acquired Thinkpad from IBM and gradually fucked it up around the T410 or T450 models as they gave in to the demand of consumers giving a shit about shaving off every gram of weight possible at the expense of ditching rugged rollcages and ditching features like optical drives. Watch some videos of people trying to simply remove a keyboard from a T450 to see what I mean.

Whirlpool also has a reputation for not radically changing the design of internal components. I called a repair shop over a washer or tumble dryer that was like 15 or 20 years old. They said at that age, if it’s not Whirlpool they won’t even show up because when the parts change every year then spare parts quickly become unavailable (of course before people start needing the spare parts). They said Whirlpool is an exception because the same parts will be used for a decade or more, which then justifies the business of making spare parts for a prolonged time (I imagine as well the aftermarket likely thrives too).

Grain of salt though because I heard Whirlpool doesn’t always put their label on their own products and Whirlpools also end up getting labeled as Sears Kenmore. If Whirlpool rebadges something else as Whirlpool, how could the design have consistency w/other Whirlpool machines? Anyway, it was just an example and possibly flawed based on one repair shop’s opinion.

The problem -- no metrics

This is all just tribal knowledge propagated ad hoc by word of mouth. The masses don’t generally know this shit and probably most of them don’t care. I think Whirlpool and Thinkpad were not even diligent enough to advertise it. Maybe they did not even know in advance they would have design consistency over the years. Perhaps if they advertise: ”uses the same motor as previous 6 models”, they would fear that it would chase away foolish consumers who would regard that as ”old”, unevolved, or non-innovative. Those same stupid consumers who are brainwashed to chase “latest and greatest” are why we face so much unrepairable garbage on the market.

Since no one tracks design stability/consistency over time (not even Consumer Reports or similar orgs), there is no incentive for manufacturers to try to satisfy the unknown & unmeasured demand that no one is looking at.

 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/21474523

Youtube was originally a match-making/dating site. Sadly it expanded beyond that into a technofeudal fiefdom that takes 45% of ad revenue from contributors. YouTube has amassed a rich collection of repair videos, both general repair and specific repairs to specific problems on particular appliances. It guts me that a protectionist unethical surveillance advertiser has exclusive control over repair information that they have jailed, restricted access to, and held hostage from all but their boot-licking pawns (3 billion of them). Google has recently locked down the platform to prevent the Tor network for fetching the content while also going around with a stick to swat the Invidious nodes that make fetching videos possible.

Google’s assault on user freedoms has ensured (for example) that I cannot go to the library (which has an uncapped Internet connection) and download videos covering how to repair my appliances so that I can go home and play them while repairing, as many times as needed. Google expects me to either drag my whole washing machine into the public library, or to memorize the steps. Try memorizing the steps to fix a Canon paper feeder. It’s probably 100 or so steps; so many steps that there is even a separate re-assembly video.

It is unreasonable to demand that repairers:

  • have an uncapped internet connection at home
  • watch copious commercial ads (some of us are ethically opposed to advertising)
  • support Google (we should have a right to boycott companies that were fined $170 million for collecting data non-consentually and exercising that right should not block repair when repair is in the public interest to avoid e-waste)

What is the fix here? Libraries are blocked by copyright that is designed to feed Google’s greed for ad revenue. Even if we could ask local govs to declare Google’s copyright on repair videos unenforcable, the videos still need to be obtained.

I think we need to invent a tech solution. Such as an app that combines the concept of bittorrent with a YouTube API whereby every peer who manages to access a video seeds it as a torrent and also grabs the transcript in a text file.

Any ideas what could reasonably be asked of a local gov to address this problem? In principle, it should involve public libraries because Google has ruined the service of the public library in this regard.

 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/21474632

All my local junkyards accept e-waste but they bounce anyone who shows up with a screwdriver. Once a machine is dumped, it becomes the property of the junkyard who sees repairers who remove stuff as a threat to their bottom line, which comes from the melt value of the metals. I cannot even pay for the parts even if I wanted. I have been kicked out of junkyards enough times that the whole staff recognises me now. It’s really fucked up that the shitty melt value of the metals is prioritised above consumers will to repair.

The disposal chain goes like this:

  1. consumer dumps appliance waste (sometimes straight to the dump, sometimes to an org in step 2)
  2. some org that decides if the thing is broken or not
  3. if it works → goes to a charity to resell
  4. if reparable → goes to a charity to fix and resell
  5. if “non-repairable” → broken down for proper disposal

That last step uses scare quotes because they are piled under such an unsurmountable stock pile of disposed appliances that only trivially repairable things get repaired. Countless things that are either repairable or good for parts get destroyed. I suspect there is a blanket assumption that inkjet printers are never regarded as repairable.

The idea of repurposing is completely absent from this process. E.g. they would never remove a broken LCD panel from a flat screen device and use it to make a lightbox / table for a stained glass artist or photographer who looks at slides.

Step 5 needs a mod. Everything not put through the charity should go to a weather-protected staging area where the general public can walk through and take what they want. Every item should be there for at least a week or two before breakdown.

Freeloaders might use such a mechanism to grab things with a high melt value. But I’m not sure a petition to the city needs to address that -- it’s the city’s problem to solve.

 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/21474636

If I have a Whirlpool machine model XYZ, broken or not I should be able to add a record to a DB that says notify me if a machine of that model is disposed of so I can pick it up for parts or come and just remove a part that I need.

Yes, this means staff in the e-waste disposal services would need to look up the model of every item disposed to see if a repairer wants to be contacted. Is that too much to ask?

 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/21474519

Not sure if a local gov could get away with this. Is it sensible to ask the local gov take formal actions to declare copyright as unenforcable on things like service manuals and wiring diagrams, which product makers protect almost like trade secrets? It’s not likely enforced anyway, but a formal step would be needed before leaked service manuals could be distributed by public libraries.

In the EU, manufacturers must share repair docs with third-party /insured/ repair professionals (not consumers) for some specific products like washing machines.

Using a stick

Would it be sensible for a local law to require those professionals who have privileged access to repair docs to share whatever they obtain in the course of their work with a public library?

using a carrot

Would it be sensible for a policy to compensate professionals who have privileged access to repair docs for sharing whatever they obtain in the course of their work with a public library? It could be abused. E.g. an appliance repair shop could submit multiple wiring diagrams for the same product as separate submissions if they are (e.g.) paid $/€ 50 per submission.

If the carrot and stick are both used, repair pros could get 50 for the first submitted doc for each model, but then have a mandate to supply any additional docs they receive for that model without further compensation. Maybe that’s too detailed for a petition.

 

Something broke. I think there was no problem when I last visited a couple days ago. Today all posts have only a down arrow for the spillover actions, no icons. If I move the mouse above where the icons /should/ be, the pointer turns into a finger. So the actions are still available but just invisible.

(edit) when I use Firefox and enable displaying images, only then can I see icons. I normally use Ungoogled Chromium with images disabled (images dramatically increase my Internet costs). So I wonder if someone tried to get fancy and install images instead of icons from fonts.

 

There are job postings lately for hacking and reverse engineering embedded systems, particularly from defense contractors. I suppose they would be doing things like capturing and hacking enemy drones.

That’s not exactly my interest, but shows there is a demand for breaking into embedded systems. I personally want to develop these skills just to repair shit like washing machines that lock me out of their protectionist PCBs designed for premature obsolescence/destruction. When the washing machine manufacturer gives me the middle finger after asking for a service manual, I need to return the sentiment and fix the thing without their support (yes, it has serial ports on the PCB).

In any case, the course should cover using tools like Bus Pirates and Flipper Zero. Anything out there in open university courses?

 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/21299422

My kitchen scale is powered by a cr2032 lithium button battery. Yes, it was sloppy of me to buy the scale without seeing how it was powered. I only use the scale once or twice per month, yet these shitty button batteries only last a few months. It seems like I only get about ~6—12 measurements before the battery is dead.

WTF? This seems to defy physics. The scale automatically powers off. Of course it must always have some power because there is no ON switch. The scale detects capacitive touch taps or weight before turning on the display.

Digital calipers use a button battery which also only gives a dozen or so measurements before the battery is dead. It seems the calipers power on when the case is snapped shut. Maybe the rattling causes it to power on since it’s very touchy. Turns on with the slightest movement.

My bicycle helmet takes a cr2032, which only lasts a few months. Perhaps because it’s hard to remember to turn off the light. But still, it’s a shitty design because it has no timer or motion sensor. Or would a motion sensor itself use more power than the LEDs?

Questions:

  • are button batteries a significant e-waste burden?
  • are the batteries themselves really short lived, or are the appliances that use them all just poorly designed?
view more: next ›