adroidBalloon

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

saw this on mastodon just now…

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Ok so isn’t the issue at hand whether the sites are to blame?

let’s break this down so I can answer you in what I think is an honest way:

  1. Are the sites legally responsible for the content they host, generally speaking and/or in this context of radicalization and such subsequent results as these?

and

  1. Do these sites bear any social/moral responsibility to moderate their more extreme content in good faith to try to prevent this sort of result?

and

  1. Is there an overlap of 1 and 2?

1 - this is for a court to decide. I’m not familiar enough with the very specifics of case law or with the suits being brought to know exactly what is being alleged, etc. I can’t opine on this other that to say that, from what I do know, it’s unlikely that a court would hold these sites legally responsible.

2 - I fully believe that, yes, sites like these, massive, general-use public sites have a social and moral responsibility to keep their platforms safe. How and what that means is a matter for much debate, and I’m sure people here will do just that.

3 - is there overlap? again, legally, I’m not sure, but there might be, and in the near future, there might be much more. also, should there be more? another subject for debate.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Trump and his supporters complained that the 2016 election was rigged even after he won.

They’ll say anything to claim victimhood, most often when the opposite is true.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (9 children)

right, but “everybody” aren’t the ones committing mass shootings all the time. that’s an alt-right crazies problem.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 years ago (10 children)

Germany=Nazi joke

not funny

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 years ago (15 children)

eh… I believe you have your controlled substances mixed up...

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 years ago

I think this is more of an official acknowledgment and them exploring how it works, not so much “breaking news” for those of us in the know. I’d imagine most people are probably unaware of this.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (12 children)

yeah, but progressives and liberals and all other "crazies and normal people" aren’t the ones committing mass shootings all the time.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

didn’t Parler have something like this, then their entire DB got hacked handed over to the FBI just after jan 6th, complete with hundreds of videos of the traitors committing crimes that they upload themselves? since Parler didn’t strip any metadata from uploaded media, the feds were able to use it all as evidence and use everyone’s IDs to tie it all to them.

I bet they arrested hundreds of people this way and used tons more of it at the various trials

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago (15 children)

interesting… whether the sites will be found liable…. it’s pretty unlikely, but it sure does shine a spotlight on how each are magnets for alt-right crazies. I wonder if that will have any effect on their moderation?

I doubt it.

view more: next ›