canihasaccount

While we're on a thread about English grammar, "who's" means "who is." The possessive of "who" is "whose."

Sorry.

1. House
2. Legion
3. Breaking Bad
4. Futurama
5. Scrubs
6. Dexter
7. Ozark
8. Mr. Robot
9. The Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt
10. Snowfall

You can buy a share or two of TSLQ to hedge against TSLA while still holding your index funds

I don't internet without uBlock. I honestly couldn't imagine it any other way.

ONLYOFFICE (sorry for the caps, poor name) has better docx compatibility than WPS or any other suite. It's the only thing I've found that can do everything in an academic style paper without issue. In addition, its source code is open (unlike WPS) and it has Zotero and Mendeley integrations. Its Zotero integration was better than its Mendeley integration last I checked.

I'm a professor and use ONLYOFFICE as the only word processor on my office computer.

Edit: apparently the Zotero plugin needs to be updated.

Same. I still occasionally browse Reddit, but I have a rule that I don't post or comment there. I do post and comment here.

Not sure? Maybe a moderator deleted my comment, but it's still visible with some Lemmy clients?

I completely agree on all points.

I can't imagine that flags will get awards automatically cancelled. Any human (f)MRI work is going to describe its participant inclusion or exclusion criteria, because you can't put people with any risk of metal in their bodies within an MRI machine. Republicans tend to like brain research because the military really likes it. Additionally, virtually all NSF broader impacts will contain at least some speculative verbiage like, "this could help to increase representation." My guess is that flags return an AI or actual person review, which then makes a decision. Some folks at my university have been told that their awards have been cancelled. My awards that have some of these words haven't been cancelled.

This has essentially no overlap with ADHD. It's just a pop/incorrect understanding of ADHD. People with ADHD won't do many of those things, and people without ADHD can do all of them. There's even some reason to think this graphic could be inversely indicative of ADHD. For example, the only research of which I'm aware on ADHD and metaphor or analogy is actually that individuals with ADHD are worse at processing and understanding metaphors and are worse at analogical reasoning.

Yeah, I understood. My reply wasn't actually directed at you; sorry for not being clear. I just wanted to add that bit in case other readers didn't know that this was more forceful than a request.