charles

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

Another thing to consider is that the PM being in the house of commons effectively elevates the leader of the opposition to being a near equal to the PM. If the PM weren’t even there, would anybody pay attention to what the leader of the opposition was saying?

I think that's a very interesting thought, I hadn't considered the impacts on the opposition if the PM wasn't in the house when I wrote my previous reply.

I definitely agree with you that there's pros and cons to either systems and it comes down a lot more to how its implemented than anything else. I also agree that this is not the best time to be experimenting with new systems/tweaks to the system and I wish there was a way for us (as a society) to better assess how a system might work without risking so much.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

It's definitely an interesting conversation to have, and I think you raise some excellent points on whether it's the most effective use of the PMs time to be in the House. I think one big drawback if they aren't is that the opposition would be able to speak about the PM without the PM being able to directly respond but a) that doesn't matter much if the party has a majority, b) it's possible this wouldn't be as big of an issue over time if we had multiple PMs not in the House as it's possible the opposition would start focusing on the leader in the house (such as deputy PM), c) it also wouldn't be entirely unprecedented as the PM isn't always in attendance, even if they are allowed to.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (4 children)

He absolutely could remain PM without being an MP but I believe he then wouldn't be allowed to actually sit or speak in the House which is obviously not ideal.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

I haven't done enough research to confidently answer your second question but for your first one:

That is the official website of the House of Commons of Canada. The process varies a bit between paper petitions and e-petitions but essentially, once the petition is certified (has enough signatures (25 for paper petitions, 500 for e-petitions), is formatted properly, and an MP is willing to present it) it will then be presented in the House by the MP associated with the petition and the government then has 45 days to respond to the content, if they fail to respond within 45 days, the MP who presented the petition can designate a committee of the house to look into why the government failed to respond.

So it doesn't force the government to enact the content of the petition, but it forces the issue to be brought up in the House and forces the government to respond.

Source of most of that info: https://www.ourcommons.ca/petitions/en/home/index

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

What's the best way to let you know if we're having issues after the maintenance windows? Any on a different platform if we have issues accessing Lemmy?

Thanks for all the hard work!!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Not sure if these are available near you but you might be able to find some steam wallet cards in stores that sell giftcards. You'd then be able to add funds to steam without using a credit card.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

A single command made me switch back to Google Assistant.

Every now and then, I'll leave the TV on while I fall asleep and for a few years now, I've just asked GA to turn off the specific tv in 2 hours. Whenever I tried to get Gemini to do the same, it would just turn off my tv immediately, no matter how I phrased the prompt.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

By saying that I didn't realize it was different in Europe. Often when we (Canada) do something different than the US, it's because it's closer to how it's done in Europe and I assumed this was one of those cases.

I'm planning on looking into this more when I have some free time as I'd like to understand where our approach to both documents came from.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Maybe things are different here in Canada but that's how I've always had it outlined. What you're describing would be called a resume here and not a CV. The intents of the two documents are not the same.

Most CVs that I've seen are usually closer to 3-5 pages but I've seen some that are ~10 pages.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Not traditionally. A CV should contain essentially everything whereas the resume is tailored to the specific position.

CVs are much more common for academic positions but I've also seen them required for very specialized roles.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

They're definitely not the same thing even though they've been used interchangeably more and more.

A CV is a comprehensive overview of everything you've accomplished and can be fairly long in certain cases (I've seen CVs of specialized professionals or tenured professors that are close to 10 pages long).

On the other hand, a resume is a concise list of your relevant skills and experiences that should be tailored to the position you are applying to and should almost never be longer than 2 pages.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Definitely nothing wrong with that!!

1
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

I might be a bit out of the loop here but why was the decision made to migrate the community to a different instance?

All I've seen is that it was to move to a "friendlier" instance, did something happen previously or is this just related to the admins of lemmy.ml?

view more: next ›