chimasterflex

joined 2 years ago
[–] chimasterflex@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Yup, just like with shinzo abe

[–] chimasterflex@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

so basically real life

[–] chimasterflex@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

I would pay to see cart narc take on JD

[–] chimasterflex@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago (3 children)

or at least ban things like styrofoam

[–] chimasterflex@lemmy.world 18 points 7 months ago

Execs are furiously taking notes right now

[–] chimasterflex@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

The real issue is putting tomatoes in the fridge.

[–] chimasterflex@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

not only that but we get a fresh look at why we were wrong and shouldn't have asked the question in the first place

[–] chimasterflex@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

This reminds me of an old Michael Jackson joke from the 90s. What does MJ like about 21 year olds? There's twenty of them. Slaps knee :explosion: .. God

[–] chimasterflex@lemmy.world 25 points 10 months ago

Upon reading this comment, thousands of conservatives exploded into a fit of rage induced by a misplaced fear of oppression

[–] chimasterflex@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It would technically be wrong because the dates would have no appropriate scale. The difference between each node could be wildly different and also irrelevant to the solution space this virtual representation is trying to convey. Egg before chicken, check

[–] chimasterflex@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I don't think that's exactly the same situation though. Your comment reads as utilitarian, is that your reasoning for it? The object personification lends to an association of empathy for the object itself. Meaning that maybe the object is a human too and acts as we do

[–] chimasterflex@lemmy.world 67 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Finally I can put some take into this. I've worked in memory testing for years and I'll tell you that it's actually pretty expected for a memory cell to fail after some time. So much so that what we typically do is build in redundancy into the memory cells. We add more memory cells than we might activate at any given time. When shit goes awry, we can reprogram the memory controller to remap the used memory cells so that the bad cells are mapped out and unused ones are mapped in. We don't probe memory cells typically unless we're doing some type of in depth failure analysis. usually we just run a series of algorithms that test each cell and identify which ones aren't responding correctly, then map those out.

None of this is to diminish the engineering challenges that they faced, just to help give an appreciation for the technical mechanisms we've improved over the last few decades

view more: next ›