digdilem

More information: It's been rolling out to Android 9+ users since November 2024 as a high priority update. Some users are reporting it installs when on battery and off wifi, unlike most apps.

App description on Play store: SafetyCore is a Google system service for Android 9+ devices. It provides the underlying technology for features like the upcoming Sensitive Content Warnings feature in Google Messages that helps users protect themselves when receiving potentially unwanted content. While SafetyCore started rolling out last year, the Sensitive Content Warnings feature in Google Messages is a separate, optional feature and will begin its gradual rollout in 2025. The processing for the Sensitive Content Warnings feature is done on-device and all of the images or specific results and warnings are private to the user.

Description by google Sensitive Content Warnings is an optional feature that blurs images that may contain nudity before viewing, and then prompts with a “speed bump” that contains help-finding resources and options, including to view the content. When the feature is enabled, and an image that may contain nudity is about to be sent or forwarded, it also provides a speed bump to remind users of the risks of sending nude imagery and preventing accidental shares. - https://9to5google.com/android-safetycore-app-what-is-it/

So looks like something that sends pictures from your messages (at least initially) to Google for an AI to check whether they're "sensitive". The app is 44mb, so too small to contain a useful ai and I don't think this could happen on-phone, so it must require sending your on-phone data to Google?

Yes, on top of trumpet winsock.

It's all so much better now.

Sometimes questions like this are tests to see how you'll react when asked to deliver the impossible.

(I mean, it's not in this case, but if that's totally how I'd answer if I'd posted it and was challenged)

Medusa rules apply - just grab a shiny shield.

Surely it's up to the advertisers to choose where who they pay money to use?

s/reminder/warning/

It's not that we "hate them" - it's that they can entirely overwhelm a low volume site and cause a DDOS.

I ran a few very low visit websites for local interests on a rural. residential line. It wasn't fast but was cheap and as these sites made no money it was good enough Before AI they'd get the odd badly behaved scraper that ignored robots.txt and specifically the rate limits.

But since? I've had to spend a lot of time trying to filter them out upstream. Like, hours and hours. Claudebot was the first - coming from hundreds of AWS IPs and dozens of countries, thousands of times an hour, repeatedly trying to download the same urls - some that didn't exist. Since then it's happened a lot. Some of these tools are just so ridiculously stupid, far more so than a dumb script that cycles through a list. But because it's AI and they're desperate to satisfy the "need for it", they're quite happy to spend millions on AWS costs for negligable gain and screw up other people.

Eventually I gave up and redesigned the sites to be static and they're now on cloudflare pages. Arguably better, but a chunk of my life I'd rather not have lost.

Atlassian is shit for forcing us into the expensive cloud for a shit product.

I feel your pain. Or rather, I felt it once and am now freed!

We were big into Atalassian when they announced they were going cloud only. We had on-prem versions of Jira, Confluence and Bitbucket

We pretty quickly said "Fuck that", mostly because we have an on-prem policy for IP protection.

I was pretty happy to spend some time searching for replacements, mostly because it was my job to apply upgrades to these steaming, tottering piles of badly written java horseshit. They looked pretty, but the upgrade process was convoluted and quite often failed terminally. I still think that the difficulty of upgrading the hosted versions was a driver towards cloud only, mostly because it exposed how shite the things were and how many complaints they must have got for offering an on-prem product that was so hard to maintain, despite looking pretty.

I take some pleasure that the Atlassian share price is now half what it was before they did this.

(If anyone was interested; Confluence and Jira were replaced by Youtrack. Bitbucket by Teamcity. Both by Jetbrains, both much easier to upgrade (Teamcity is web-based one-click), and our licencing costs are about half what we paid to Atlassian)

And that despite charging for it, they fill many versions of it with adverts, install without asking bloatware and crap paid for by other companies to shove down your throat, and also sells your personal information to (checks) at least 801 third parties.

Not such a lad for learning from history, is he?

Oh look, a speedbump.

I'm beginning to think this term is more about Vance more than Trump. At least, that's the plan by those behind Trump.

Let Trump go mad and do everything evil at a hundred miles an hour, which is what's underway. Create utter chaos and make it impossible for anyone to draw breath and structure a defence. Then when the country finally pushes back (Maybe after about year) and he's impeached, slip in JD Vance as a more moderate leader and everyone will be so grateful the Republicans secure several terms by turning against and blaming everything on Trump.

I could be wrong. Anyone making predictions in this chaos is guessing.