So perhaps one alternative way to estimate their quality is to check the number of citations, many have more than 100 citations, which is a sign of quality
Andrew Wakefield's 1998 paper has 457 citations on PubMed
flaviat
joined 1 month ago
So perhaps one alternative way to estimate their quality is to check the number of citations, many have more than 100 citations, which is a sign of quality
Andrew Wakefield's 1998 paper has 457 citations on PubMed
The Wikibooks book on statistics is surprisingly decent. Hopefully it inspires the reader to acknowledge that there are a lot more things to study apart from Bayes.