floquant

joined 9 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Man, there's some lore behind Nvidia support in Linux. Short of it: Nvidia are assholes, they pretty much could give Linux users an on-par experience to Windows, but don't want to. Things have been generally improving in the last 5 years or so I would say though. CUDA and PCI Passthrough also usually work, so getting a cheap Intel Arc to draw your DE and using your Nvidia for heavy lifting is a relatively cheap and 'drop-in' fix to your workflow.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Linux focused companies like Microsoft

my sides

Being a contributor to an open-source project is not the same as actually owning a "commercial" product. They can voice opinions in the mailing lists, but they don't have direct influence. Sure, some maintainers work for those companies, but I would say that's hardly the same. It's sponsorship, and it's welcome pretty much no matter where it comes from in my view.

If those companies disappeared overnight, Linux would be fine. Development would be a lot slower, sure, but it wouldn't implode and instantly become worthless like macOS or Windows

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

"Richest" doesn't mean what you think it means

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

"Paradigm" is a word I chose to convey a specific meaning, which is "the way you approach/think about something". It might be more common in my language, I'm not trying to make either crypto or me sound smarter. I'm for precision of language, if you're more into newspeak you do you. You also seem to think I'm trying to convince you that "crypto is good", which is not the case. You have either misunderstood my comment, or are just trying to pick a bone. Either way, that's not very debatable for a racoon :)

My point is that people fall into fallacies by simplifying things too much, and only looking at the surface. See how your doubling down on "crypto actually bad" is beside it? Granted, I really should've picked a different case in point than cryptocurrencies ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago (5 children)

I'll bite. How? It's open source software championed by a Finnish academic professor.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Sorry, but then by that argument cryptography itself is bad because "pedos use it"? Criminals will always use privacy-preserving technology/techniques/strategies. Should we renounce our right to have secure communication, or a decentralized currency because of that? Hasn't this argument been done to death already?

The underlying technology of a thing doesn’t have much bearing on the properties of the thing as far as practical usage goes.

Excuse me, what? Of course it does matter if the backup for all your life's photos is in an hard disk in your living room, or it's on Google's server. Of course it matters if the platform we're talking on is Lemmy, and not Reddit. It does make a difference if the car you're driving is gas or electric, where it was made, if it shows you ads or not. What are you going on about? It makes all the difference in the world, but that's on "the backend" and no one remembers that it does matter

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The internet is a buzzword thrown onto old concepts? Instantaneous transfer of large amounts of data? Democratization and seamless diffusion of anything, from memes to "money"? "no but crypto is indeed a scam" is completely missing my point, and hitting the meme again

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

You can do almost anything given enough time and a Turing machine ;)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The same room? Remember to take your meds

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (8 children)

No hate, but this is exactly proving the point of the meme. There's so many new concepts and paradigms, each so complex and constantly evolving, that we need to rely on familiar comparisons that strip away the true identities of the subject. And I think this is true for pretty much every everyone in this information (bombardment) age, myself included.

People tend to forget that cryptocurrencies are based on cryptography, and were founded on the dream of building a decentralized system, built by the people, free from "big player" censorship and influence, in the wake of the 2008 crisis. If you are on the Fediverse, I guess you share that dream. But then the finance "bros" started coming in and badabing badabang now it's another asset you trade through your bank like stocks or gold. Then came the NFTs and yes, somehow "crypto" evolved into being the prime speculation and scamming vector.

And the same goes on for every news topic. "Trump!" "Gaza!" "AI!" "Climate!". Our brains try to reduce these mind-melting concepts hitting us all the time to simplified good/bad or us/them categorizations. And we're left utterly unable to actually tackle and act upon anything at all.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (3 children)

The kind that can decode high resolution, high bitrate video in real time

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

The introduction also reminds me of some other modern hyped technology...

Great share, thanks!

edit: Oof, the subprime mortgage emergency stop analogy too, to a T

view more: next ›