freagle

joined 3 years ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

Manage text files

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

So confident in the IP regime of the US military

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Let's go Keysenianismo!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Ooohhh that makes a lot more sense now

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Wow, no mention of the fact that Libya was one of these most robust, resilient, and effective economies in all of Africa until the US destroyed it, mass murdered its people, tortured its leaders, and left it ruin.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think that, of all the governments on the planet, there's no better government on the planet to have this particular power than the government of the PRC.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (6 children)

This framing takes all comparison out of the equation. The reality is that oil was monopolized by the white supremacist patriarchal capitalist North Atlantic Eurocentric empire - the same empire that has been dominating the globe for 500 years; the empire that invented racism as we know it today; the empire that at one point dominated 80% of the world population; the empire that dropped nukes on civilians; the empire that starves entire nations hoping the desperation of the people will cause them to get rid of leaders who are not aligned with the empire; the empire that trained death squads to go and murder entire families in cold blood for decades across multiple continents.

China is withholding critical materials from that empire. It's not just a country holding something back from another country in a political vacuum. We're talking about the actual real historical process of resisting the bloodiest and most brutal empire humanity has ever seen. Yes, it will make the USA seethe and seek to dominate via violence but they already do that every single day. Starving the war machine is exactly what needs to be done right now for the sake of everyone and everything on this planet.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (10 children)

China has not dropped a single bomb in conflict since 1979 - 46 years ago. They have a nuclear policy of non-first-use. They have a consistent diplomatic policy of respecting everyone's national sovereignty, of resolving conflict through patience and mutual understanding.

Why don't you like them having such diplomatic power over industrial materials? Because they might use that power to push more nations towards mutual development and away from wasting resources on building more weapons in arms races?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

Flying strategic nuclear B-52 bombers in Ukraine as part of NATO exercises is not pepper spray

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Agendas create software.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

So let's say sea levels are on the rise everywhere, right? And then let's say a journalist says "something strange is going on in the Indian Ocean, it's rising", yeah? And they never once mention anything about any other oceans. Would that be appropriate journalism? If someone says "Hey, all oceans are rising" are you gonna say "that's whataboutery"?

No, you're not. So when propaganda is on the rise globally, with the USA and Europe leading the pack as they have been for several hundred years, and someone writes an article about Chinese propaganda being on the rise, and they work for one of the propaganda outlets of an enemy of China, do you think that would appropriate journalism?

 

I am looking for anyone writing about the various theories and "revelations" regarding extraterrestrial and cryptoterrestrial technologies and their implication in geopolitics.

Specifically, I am looking for analyses that seek to identify conditions that might be true if we assume one or more actors of various classes (states, militaries, intelligence communities, alliances, non-state actors, "aliens" themselves) has possession of non-contiguous technologies. Having identified some of these conditions, I would hope the analysis then goes on to compare historical and current conditions to see if there is evidence to support or contradict such possession.

An example might be an analysis that shows a state, like the USA, with possession of such non-contiguous technology, if they were able to make it battle ready, might under invest in traditional warfare production like what we see today.

Another example might be how a state like the USA might use limited conflicts to gather intelligence on capabilities from other states that could reveal those states' level of non-contiguous tech readiness, and then analyze how the Ukraine war might fit those conditions or predict how the prosecution of a hot conflict with China in Taiwan or Korea might look under these conditions.

Does anyone know of any writers doing this sort of work?

 

The UK arresting an average of 9 people a day. Meanwhile, arrests in Russia are below 500 each year, sometimes far below.

 

This guy is the researcher cited: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/seas/people/academic-staff/david-tobin

At first glance, he seems somewhat legit, but I've never heard of him before. What do we know about this guy, his research, and what's the best way to understand these claims?

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/863212

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/863209

Archived version: https://archive.ph/5Ok1c
Archived version: https://web.archive.org/web/20230731013125/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-66337328

 

I've been working my way through the Decolonized Buffalo episodes in order and over the last few weeks every time I update my feeds I get a network error when fetching the list of episodes.

 

This is truly a wild analysis. It's entirely plausible that Black rock owns the longs and Citadel owns the shorts and that they collaborate. But just the circular ownership leading to total dominance of the market by a few hundred people is enough to make this worth reading.

 

This feels like an op to me. The timing is uncanny. If this story develops, I predict some escalation of current conflicts with some advanced weaponry (chemical, biological, nuclear, energy, space-based, etc) and the alien story to be used as cover.

Alternatively, it's a continuation of reactionary mobilization propaganda. Thought?

 

Anyone got any more insight into this? Hypersonics are supposed to be a significant advantage for both Russia and China. If the West has a counter for these, that seems real bad.

 

What do you all think of this?

view more: next ›