I'm not. I'm telling you that running a campaign on nothing other than 'not that guy' is a recipe for a disaster.
Do. not. fall. into. that. trap.
its a trap this entire thread demostrates people are actively falling into.
I'm not. I'm telling you that running a campaign on nothing other than 'not that guy' is a recipe for a disaster.
Do. not. fall. into. that. trap.
its a trap this entire thread demostrates people are actively falling into.
Her opponent was Donald Trump. That’s it. That’s the reason.
JFC, no, no it isn't. This is exactly the point I'm making, this is exactly the reason kamala lost. The majority of the population doesn't give a shit about politics and is uninformed and they dont bother understanding the political landscape.
If you run a campaign on 'im not them' and 'i wont fix any of the things that are negatively impacting your life' you will lose. Never mind demonstrating that you're willing to fucking murder an entire people.
Why? because people are going to say 'well both candidate suck, not going to bother with either'
Then you have the other candidate claiming to they'll fix the price of eggs (even if they wont) and at least they're addressing issues impacting you.
Facts:
Running around saying 'i'm not my opponent, and I will do nothing to help you but i'll do this other thing that costs corporate american nothing and impacts maybe 2 million people' is a fucking recipe for disaster.
This is why kamala was missing 20 million votes. not because she was black, not because she was female, but because she offered nothing for people to show up to vote for her and the democrats despite massive systemetic problems our country is currently facing. When your major policy announcement is lol weed something the majority of the country already has easy access too people will just yawn and stay home.
If you're Canadian reading this thread: Do. not. be. this. person. demand your candidates improve your lives. do not think that simply not being the other person will win.
you mean like the suddenly 10 conservative democrats who just happen to vote to allow trump to continue dismantling the government? including the democratic leader in the senate schumer? stop excusing their lack of accomplishments on a few bad applies. the bulk of the party is rotten.
It wouldnt have mattered if they had 90 members in the senate and 90% of the house they'd find the votes to prevent anything that helps the working class.
I'm not conflating anything, I'm telling you to stop worrying about the candidate you dont like and demand your preferred candidate make a case on why they are worth putting the effort on showing up for to people who dont give a shit about politics. my examples were of what not to fucking do, and you immediately start doing a few of them. good job.
the US liberals (harris/biden/pelosi/schumer,etc) and those like them (you) think you can brow beat people into compliance by fear of conservatives and that doesnt work. all it does it cause people to tune you out and then ignore the election entirely.
lol yes being an asshole definitely is going to win you votes. lol you idiots never learn jesus.
imagine thinking that politicians should serve their constituents interests in order to ensure people are willing to vote for them is 'foreign interference'. lolol
laugh she won in my state silly. she lost because she didnt give people a reason to show up for her. recognizing and acknowledging that someone is a shit person and thats why they lost lets you address the problems I mentioned above.
but yes keep burying your head in the sand. the DNC is likely to lose the next election too unless they learn to give their base what they want.
I agree liberals dont make tha same mistake as your american equivalents. Make sure your candidates running actually gives people reasons to vote for your candidate.
Dont think you can just goose step to the party line of no change for the working class. Dont try to deny and support a genocide. Dont think the other candidate sucking is sufficient for you to brow beat people to vote for your candidate.
If there's a group asking for a change that you might not technically agree with but doesnt harm people do it anyways
think the pissy letters were about what the user was accessing not how frequently.
lol NP. two party systems blow man.
Because all our representation is an embarrassment. Most of us have stopped bothering its a fucking mess.
not really, just tie it with 2fa SMS style and the hurdle is large enough most companies won't bother.
huh? im very curious on how your thought processes lead you to that statement from my comments lol.