nixos
jimmy90
joined 2 years ago
Not so sure about that. It's adversarial in nature but that's not a bad thing. It means we keep changing hopefully for the better for everyone
that's why in many european states we've evolved to variants of multi party, transferable votes systems
it still has inherent flaws and it still seems to have 2 sides (one side kinda sorta has to be the majority "in power", and the others in opposition) but it feels and maybe is more representative of the vote we cast
step 2 probably forgive both sides
but apart from that sounds good
so what's the timeline for peace?
lol
like mandela and the IRA do you think they will make peace and stop martyring their people? when?
makes sense
mlk
do you mean Malcolm X? neither of them were terrorists as far as i know but X was a bit more radical
like mandela and the IRA do you think they will make peace and stop martyring their people? when?
now that's a freudian slip if ever there was one. you mean rubble of course
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russia%E2%80%93Hamas_relations
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestine%E2%80%93Russia_relations
thanks for the info!
amazing what you can find on wikipedia these days
view more: next ›
i've installed linux on 20 wildly different machines and never regretted it
there have been a very low number of devices that didn't work but are always the least vital in the machine