julietOscarEcho

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Oh wait, I was thinking of fallout tactics. BOS was like wasteland skinned diablo right? That is, not turn based so not in my original grumpy old man comment.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Eh, I remember enjoying it, though never played it again so 🀷 possibly nostalgia. It was just not an open world or rpg.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Russerfrushenrushen kids and their first person fallout games. All my homes know best fallout is third person isometric turn based.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean they are objectively poor in a lot of ways, but you're spot on. At the time they were fricking mind blowing. Space opera/space cowboys on the big screen! Before that we had what? 2001 and star trek?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Ah an economist, say no more fam.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What are you talking about? They're both estimates extrapolated from samples. I think most statisticians would prefer stratified sampling over one company's payrolls processing, but whatever. Maybe chuds would argue that ADP is so much more efficient/accurate because it's outside of the "swamp" of govt, it's certainly an independent data point. I mean I agree with you in that BLS is not reliable either. Real time economics is hard.

If you honestly preferred ADP all along and will continue to espouse it's superiority when it next contradicts your view rather than confirming it (as it will because data are noisy) then more power to you.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

BLS jobs report was a beat, +140k jobs and unemployment down a shade. I agree with you on the themes but it doesn't help to cherry pick data.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Oh shiiiit, do that and come back and talk to us when you get to the time travel level.

Are we just in the phase of the medium where technology isn't the defining quality. It would be slightly weird to try to stay at the forefront of, say, novels without any regard for reading classics. Why shouldn't games be the same?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

There's actually a decent analogy there I think. The hamburger won't cost less, because the service of customization it itself less efficient: serving customers with their preference of with/without is more expensive than just pickles for all. Likewise I imagine making a game that looks OK with/out RT is extra work than just with.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yeah but there's a subset of people who are both slightly humourless and who don't know not to affirm the consequent who are going to be super offended.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Like a reverse roko's bassilisk. Interesting. I mean that way around is at least comforting/ gives main character energy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"genuinely" herein lies the key. Interesting to pick Jedi as an example because I think we can agree that people who out that on a census or whatever typically have their tongue firmly in cheek. Wicca probably sits somewhere on a spectrum between that and the major religions. You'd be mad naive to assume that everyone holds beliefs exactly as stated. My papi was a priest and we're pretty sure never believed in god. L Ron Hubbard himself was for sure was grifting FFS. Add to that and most religions can't even agree what authentic means for their community and LOL

1
QB wolf (sh.itjust.works)
 

Yuck twitter. But:

1
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Today I received in the post a kit I had bought already. I think this is the acid test for unpainted models. If you can remember everything you have yet to paint you're good. Above that is verboten for me now.

Anyone else have a rule of thumb to keep themselves in check?

 

I made an inpromptu stop in silverknowles today and it was fucking delightful. Amazing live music and a shady spot to enjoy refreshments. Can't recommend enough.

 

Michael Howard today (on BBC radio 4):

The point about public ownership is this: if you have the industry in public ownership, it has to compete for resources with health, with education, with the police, with all the other legitimate demands on the public purse, and water when it was in public ownership was way down the queue.

People pay water rates Michael. This is an income bearing asset that could have supported other public programs. Instead it's been used to enrich the already wealthy at the expense of underinvestment in infrastructure, callous polluting, and the risk of damaging bancruptcy.

When you release it into the private sector, you have recourse to private capital. You can make the investment that’s needed.

Errr. Except a PLC's cost of capital is higher than the cost of govornment debt, so any investment is going to be harder to make and ultimately will cost the public more. As evidenced by the fact that they have done exactly the opposite of "make the investment that’s needed" over the past 30 years.

Dear god, he can't possibly be actually that dense. I have to assume he, and by extension his party that continues to support this stupid idea, is acting in bad faith.

 

I have my gripes but I agree with all of these. Looking forward to my first game next week!

 

I don't love free wargear (because there will inevitably better or worse options when everything is a straight swap whereas with points cost you can balance finely), but I can see that it makes life easier.

Fixed unit sizes, however, are supremely shit. All in all totally ripped the variety out of list building, which was one of my favourite things about the game. Lists now will look mostly identical.

 

Enjoying what we've seen so far from the rules, if a bit disappointed by some of the loss of flexibility.

 

Come say hi packer backers.

view more: next β€Ί