jwu

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Those don't need to be consecutive. King Charles III's father was not King Charles II. So he could just be the 4th in his family with that name. And the dad was the 3rd in family with the other name.

But it's also possibly a nickname thing.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 years ago

Don't worry. You'll learn object permanence any time now.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Actually maybe.

He probably thinks if she had won, he could have just acted angry and then not done all the 2020 election stuff. Could start his TV network or whatever?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 years ago

This feels like malicious compliance.

Like the photographer was told they must stand in the very corner of the yard even after they pointed out the tree was in the way.